topic title: Suggestions, requests, bug fixes for next release.
-
Posts: 1,062
- Joined: 20 Jan 2010
#16
this is kind of an odd / large request. But maybe if you find time could we put together a PAE build of antix?
-
Posts: 1,139
- Joined: 26 Apr 2008
#17
Anti, for what it is worth, the antiX core version that I am using now on the Lenovo has sound that works, so I don't know what it is that is tripping up the full M11.0 version or the Swift Linux version; I think I see it though; you have the older 2.6.32 kernel included with the core version I snagged back in April as opposed to the problematic 2.6.36 kernel that came with the final release.
I just installed the 3.0.4 Liquorix kernel but have not used it here yet, but it works perfectly on the Gateway with an otherwise identical setup.
So you can deduce a bit of what's going on, here is the inxi dump that I promised:
I just installed the 3.0.4 Liquorix kernel but have not used it here yet, but it works perfectly on the Gateway with an otherwise identical setup.
So you can deduce a bit of what's going on, here is the inxi dump that I promised:
Code: Select all
inxi -F
System: Host: antiX-core Kernel: 2.6.32-1-mepis-smp i686 (32 bit)
Desktop Xfce 4.8.3 Distro: antiX-M11-core-squeeze-686 Jayaben Desai 31 March 2011
Machine: System: LENOVO product: LENOVO3000 Y410
Mobo: LENOVO model: IGT30 version: REFERENCE Bios: LENOVO version: 05CN57WW(V3.02) date: 01/30/2008
CPU: Dual core Intel Core2 Duo CPU T5450 (-MCP-) cache: 2048 KB flags: (lm nx sse sse2 sse3 ssse3)
Clock Speeds: 1: 1000.00 MHz 2: 1000.00 MHz
Graphics: Card: Intel Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (primary)
X.Org: 1.11.1 driver: vesa Resolution: 1280x800@0.0hz
GLX Renderer: Rasterizer GLX Version: 2.1 Mesa 7.11
Audio: Card: Intel 82801H (ICH8 Family) HD Audio Controller driver: HDA Intel Sound: ALSA ver: 1.0.21
Network: Card-1: Broadcom NetLink BCM5906M Fast Ethernet PCI Express driver: tg3
IF: eth0 state: down speed: N/A duplex: N/A mac: 00:1b:38:a5:c6:06
Card-2: Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG [Golan] Network Connection driver: iwl3945
IF: wlan0 state: up mac: 00:1c:bf:c6:f6:99
Drives: HDD Total Size: 160.0GB (2.4% used) 1: /dev/sda FUJITSU_MHY2160B 160.0GB
Partition: ID: / size: 9.9G used: 3.7G (39%) fs: auto ID: swap-1 size: 2.15GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap
Sensors: System Temperatures: cpu: 45.0C mobo: N/A
Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info: Processes: 120 Uptime: 1:47 Memory: 635.2/2016.1MB Client: Shell inxi: 1.7.23
masinick wrote:Anti, I am sorry that I did not find this sooner - either in MEPIS or in antiX, but the sound and everything else work perfectly on my Gateway 2000 Series Model PA6A 17" portable. On my 15" Lenovo 3000 Series Y410 laptop, MEPIS and antiX both install nicely, but something I hadn't looked closely enough at is that the sound doesn't work at all on this platform. I'll have to get you the specs with inxi -F on it later; remind me if I forget.
What helped me eventually find this was running Jason Hsu's creative Swift Linux. I tried a few of his different builds, and none of them would do sound on the Lenovo, yet they worked perfectly on the Gateway. So I went back with antiX, then with MEPIS, and found it to be an issue with both systems. It probably goes back somehow to the MEPIS kernel and its interaction with the hardware, but I'm not sure of that; I run antiX mostly on the Gateway and have not experimented much on the Lenovo, but one way to know is that I have an antiX core out there with a Damentz' Liquorix kernel. I'll have to check sound. If it works, then chances are it's the kernel that is responsible for the lack of sound. Maybe there is a work around, but it hasn't worked yet for me.
I like the expansion of window manager choices - at least in the"full edition". Hope that the artists can apply some of the same great magic they have given us in Fluxbox and IceWM and apply it to JWM as well.
As for me, in my own endeavors, I've now put together two really outstanding antiX core systems, both using Sid, one on the Gateway and one on the Lenovo. Both are awesome. I just revamped my original prototype antiX core image on the Gateway and completely replaced it with a new one, using the M11.0 core installer, which is so much easier to work with than the original prototype; fantastic progress made over the past year and a half on that!
I am going to have to keep a closer eye out here, since work is underway. I definitely want to review every build, and hopefully I won't let anything get past me this time around! Keep up the great work!
-
Posts: 1,028
- Joined: 21 Aug 2011
#18
A very rare event...
An updated version of JWM has been released - JWM v2.1.0 <> 20110925.
Change list and download:
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://joewing.net/programs/jwm/history.shtml"
linktext was:"http://joewing.net/programs/jwm/history.shtml"
====================================
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://joewing.net/programs/jwm/"
linktext was:"http://joewing.net/programs/jwm/"
====================================
Might it be worth including the newest version in the forthcoming antiX release?
An updated version of JWM has been released - JWM v2.1.0 <> 20110925.
Change list and download:
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://joewing.net/programs/jwm/history.shtml"
linktext was:"http://joewing.net/programs/jwm/history.shtml"
====================================
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://joewing.net/programs/jwm/"
linktext was:"http://joewing.net/programs/jwm/"
====================================
Might it be worth including the newest version in the forthcoming antiX release?
-
anticapitalista
Posts: 5,955
- Site Admin
- Joined: 11 Sep 2007
#19
It (latest jwm) is in Debian/sid so we can include it. BTW we release it may have filtered to Testing.
-
Posts: 1,028
- Joined: 21 Aug 2011
#20
A lightweight tool for managing and manipulating groups of files will be a useful addition to antiX. Even better is one that is not tied to a particular file manager.
Here's a one I've used for a while, xFnRename:
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://home.hccnet.nl/paul.schuurmans/linux/index.html"
linktext was:"http://home.hccnet.nl/paul.schuurmans/linux/index.html"
====================================
Extract from description:
Here's a one I've used for a while, xFnRename:
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://home.hccnet.nl/paul.schuurmans/linux/index.html"
linktext was:"http://home.hccnet.nl/paul.schuurmans/linux/index.html"
====================================
Extract from description:
It is available in a small GUI version and also a tiny ncurses version. Both will be welcome additions to antiX, and be in keeping with offering GUI and terminal/console equivalents.xFnRename is a simple utility that allows you to easily rename multiple files.
There are options to add prefixes and/or extensions, delete or replace
characters, convert to upper or lowercase, and save settings for later use.
-
Posts: 173
- Joined: 09 Sep 2011
#21
A nice idea as KDE and GNOME have utilities like that available for example.SamK wrote:A lightweight tool for managing and manipulating groups of files will be a useful addition to antiX. Even better is one that is not tied to a particular file manager.
Here's a one I've used for a while, xFnRename:
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://home.hccnet.nl/paul.schuurmans/linux/index.html"
linktext was:"http://home.hccnet.nl/paul.schuurmans/linux/index.html"
====================================
Extract from description:It is available in a small GUI version and also a tiny ncurses version. Both will be welcome additions to antiX, and be in keeping with offering GUI and terminal/console equivalents.xFnRename is a simple utility that allows you to easily rename multiple files.
There are options to add prefixes and/or extensions, delete or replace
characters, convert to upper or lowercase, and save settings for later use.
-
Posts: 1,062
- Joined: 20 Jan 2010
#22
This newer version no longer conflicts with the nvidia driver !!!! __{{emoticon}}__ installed and working with it now __{{emoticon}}__SamK wrote:A very rare event...
An updated version of JWM has been released - JWM v2.1.0 <> 20110925.
Change list and download:
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://joewing.net/programs/jwm/history.shtml"
linktext was:"http://joewing.net/programs/jwm/history.shtml"
====================================
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://joewing.net/programs/jwm/"
linktext was:"http://joewing.net/programs/jwm/"
====================================
Might it be worth including the newest version in the forthcoming antiX release?
-
Posts: 1,028
- Joined: 21 Aug 2011
#23
Re: Mounting NTFS on-the-fly.
Scenario 3 of my previous post in this thread has been removed as it was incorrectly reported as working.
post22173.html#p22173
See:
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://www.tuxera.com/community/ntfs-3g-faq/#unprivileged"
linktext was:"http://www.tuxera.com/community/ntfs-3g ... privileged"
====================================
Scenario 3 of my previous post in this thread has been removed as it was incorrectly reported as working.
post22173.html#p22173
See:
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://www.tuxera.com/community/ntfs-3g-faq/#unprivileged"
linktext was:"http://www.tuxera.com/community/ntfs-3g ... privileged"
====================================
-
Posts: 299
- Joined: 18 Dec 2008
#24
Would Gigolo File System Manager be a good match for the next antiX or is it too dependent on GT2K? (GT2K? I'm not really sure what that means and how that impacts an OS like antiX and its goals. . __{{emoticon}}__ __{{emoticon}}__ )
-
anticapitalista
Posts: 5,955
- Site Admin
- Joined: 11 Sep 2007
#25
Gigolo was already included in antiX-M11 (full).
-
Posts: 299
- Joined: 18 Dec 2008
#26
Oops! I should have known. Lots of good stuff in M11. Maybe we should have a list of what is not in this amazing little distro. __{{emoticon}}__
-
Posts: 2
- Joined: 14 Nov 2011
#27
After a lot of googling and head-scratching, I think I found a simple solution to that one . . .
- what could go wrong? __{{emoticon}}__ I did this about 5 minutes ago btw, so I couldn't call it fully tested!
But it seems like no-one is going to fix the bugs in consolekit or slim, so perhaps lightdm is the way to go for antix too??
This really annoyed me too, as it was one of the things that worked in 8.2 and then was broken in 11.DeepDayze wrote:Getting USB automounting upon insertion working properly as it hasn't worked at all for me.
After a lot of googling and head-scratching, I think I found a simple solution to that one . . .
Code: Select all
apt-get install lightdm
apt-get remove slim
shutdown -r now
But it seems like no-one is going to fix the bugs in consolekit or slim, so perhaps lightdm is the way to go for antix too??
-
Posts: 1,308
- Joined: 31 Aug 2009
#28
I think e3 is a GREAT idea. It's 1/10th the size of nano even with static linking while nano links to several libraries.SamK wrote:I suggest e3 a console text editor be considered. It is in the repo.
It is a micro single file binary editor (no dependencies) that emulates the users choice of key-bindings:
- EMACS
Nedit (personal preference as the keys strokes are very similar to many common GUI editors)
Pico (same as nano which is based on pico)
vi
Wordstar
-
Posts: 173
- Joined: 09 Sep 2011
#29
That would make it a great editor for a livecd or an emergency disk
As for LightDM has anyone tested it thoroughly and did it work around the bugs in Consolekit?
BitJam wrote:I think e3 is a GREAT idea. It's 1/10th the size of nano even with static linking while nano links to several libraries.SamK wrote:I suggest e3 a console text editor be considered. It is in the repo.
It is a micro single file binary editor (no dependencies) that emulates the users choice of key-bindings:
- EMACS
Nedit (personal preference as the keys strokes are very similar to many common GUI editors)
Pico (same as nano which is based on pico)
vi
Wordstar
That would make it a great editor for a livecd or an emergency disk
As for LightDM has anyone tested it thoroughly and did it work around the bugs in Consolekit?
-
Posts: 2
- Joined: 14 Nov 2011
#30
>>That would make it a great editor for a livecd or an emergency disk
Like vi? (I'm serious) Or ed (I'm joking).
>>As for LightDM has anyone tested it thoroughly and did it work around the bugs in Consolekit?
No proper testing by me. Really it's a workaround rather than a fix, it's very gnome-ey and takes up about 6MB more disk space than it needs to. It also partially breaks Thunar (under some circumstances, it does on my desktop but not on my laptop . . ) and causes some irritation with different ways of handling the desktop background, default session file, etc.
HOWEVER, I can use my camera and my removable media again! Hooray! Not being able to use USB sticks is a deal-breaker, or a distro-breaker anyway.
So AntiX + lightdm = bodge
- but for the time being, better than changing distro altogether. Is there a real world alternative to Slim? Something from the ancient history of X11 maybe?
Like vi? (I'm serious) Or ed (I'm joking).
>>As for LightDM has anyone tested it thoroughly and did it work around the bugs in Consolekit?
No proper testing by me. Really it's a workaround rather than a fix, it's very gnome-ey and takes up about 6MB more disk space than it needs to. It also partially breaks Thunar (under some circumstances, it does on my desktop but not on my laptop . . ) and causes some irritation with different ways of handling the desktop background, default session file, etc.
HOWEVER, I can use my camera and my removable media again! Hooray! Not being able to use USB sticks is a deal-breaker, or a distro-breaker anyway.
So AntiX + lightdm = bodge
- but for the time being, better than changing distro altogether. Is there a real world alternative to Slim? Something from the ancient history of X11 maybe?