Rademes wrote:Aleph, have you read these articles?
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/using-best-web-browser-linux/"
linktext was:"http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/using-best ... ser-linux/"
====================================
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://www.linux.com/news/which-linux-web-browser-right-you"
linktext was:"https://www.linux.com/news/which-linux- ... -right-you"
====================================
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://superuser.com/questions/403594/fastest-browser-to-run-over-a-forwarded-x11-session"
linktext was:"http://superuser.com/questions/403594/f ... 11-session"
====================================
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://www.tecmint.com/best-top-linux-open-source-web-browser/"
linktext was:"http://www.tecmint.com/best-top-linux-o ... b-browser/"
====================================
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_lightweight_web_browsers"
linktext was:"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compariso ... b_browsers"
====================================
Last link will give you very good comparison of browsers!
Thanks Rademes. No exactly these articles, but yes I have information about. I have tried even Vivaldi (a very interesting and fast web browser) in a more powerful machine.
After read the articles I think we have good web browsers in Linux, the problem is the segment of old limited machines around 8-10 years.
I think the winner is Qupzilla, something lighter and not buggy is difficult to find.
Min (the sing Star
__{{emoticon}}__ ) seems to be a candidate.