4.2.1 kernels - Page 2

male · posted: 2015-10-05 20:05

inxi -Fxz
System:    Host: x40RD Kernel: 4.2.1-antix.2-486-smp i686 (32 bit gcc: 4.9.2)
           Desktop: Fluxbox 1.3.5 Distro: antiX-14-a3-RD_386-full Killah P 11 October 2014
Machine:   System: IBM product: 2371H8G v: ThinkPad X40
           Mobo: IBM model: 2371H8G Bios: IBM v: 1UETD3WW (2.08 ) date: 12/21/2006
CPU:       Single core Intel Pentium M (-UP-) cache: 2048 KB
           flags: (sse sse2) bmips: 2790 speed: 1400 MHz (max)
Graphics:  Card: Intel 82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device bus-ID: 00:02.0
           Display Server: X.Org 1.17.2 drivers: intel (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
           Resolution: 1024x768@50.01hz
           GLX Renderer: Mesa DRI Intel 852GM/855GM x86/MMX/SSE2
           GLX Version: 1.3 Mesa 10.6.8 Direct Rendering: Yes
Audio:     Card Intel 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) AC'97 Audio Controller
           driver: snd_intel8x0 ports: 1c00 18c0 bus-ID: 00:1f.5
           Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.2.1-antix.2-486-smp
Network:   Card-1: Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG [Calexico2] Network Connection
           driver: ipw2200 v: 1.2.2kmprq bus-ID: 02:02.0
           IF: eth0 state: down mac: <filter>
           Card-2: 3Com 3cCFE575CT CardBus [Cyclone] driver: 3c59x port: 3000 bus-ID: 03:00.0
           IF: eth1 state: unknown speed: 100 Mbps duplex: full mac: <filter>
Drives:    HDD Total Size: 60.1GB (13.3% used) ID-1: /dev/sda model: MXSSD1MNANO size: 60.1GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 11G used: 3.5G (36%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda7
           ID-2: swap-1 size: 3.22GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda5
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 49.0C mobo: 44.0C
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: 4266
Info:      Processes: 91 Uptime: 1 min Memory: 90.6/1502.6MB
           Init: systemd runlevel: 5 Gcc sys: 5.2.1 Client: Shell (bash 4.3.421) inxi: 2.2.16

... the mouse is first visible if I even start the terminal.
Somehow I find that familiar but, I do not know where I begin to look for ... __{{emoticon}}__

josef.bunes · posted: 2015-10-08 09:20

What is different from generic kernel? Why shall I install this one(antix) rather than generic one?

rokytnji · posted: 2015-10-08 12:14

josef.bunes wrote:What is different from generic kernel? Why shall I install this one(antix) rather than generic one?

how-to-search-for-a-solution-when-you-have-a-antix-problem-t5387.html

Just in case you did not read that. I'll leave others to answer you question point by point.

jdmeaux1952 · posted: 2015-10-09 17:17

On my MSI S6000, I have tried a variety of the 4.2.1 kernels and the legacy version will not allow my wireless to function at all. The gnu and the antix 4.2.* all function with wireless except for the legacy.

masinick · posted: 2015-10-15 12:35

Interesting discussion about kernels. While on one hand, I've been *** extremely *** fortunate with Linux kernels, even TEST Linux kernels, they are not perfect. Over the past twenty years or so, I've probably had four or five of them that would not work properly with my hardware. Given the hundreds, (if not thousands) of Linux kernels I have used, dating clear back to the day when graphical capabilities were limited, there have been some systems that could only do certain things, a few kernels that disabled networking for my hardware, but well over 99% of them worked; don't know if I can put SIX"9s" on that 99%, eg. 99.999999%, but I'm sure that the reliability factor of the kernels, even test kernels that I've used between 1995 and 2015 has been somewhere in the 99.99 to 99.995% range or better. Stable kernels have been extremely close to 100% reliable in that same time frame.

skidoo · posted: 2015-10-16 01:57

josef.bunes wrote:What is different from generic kernel? Why shall I install this one(antix) rather than generic one?

Maybe a thread dedicated to this question should be stickied in one of the subforums.
The forum search results for posts containing"kernel" yields 8,000 (or so, I'm exaggerating) results.
Hey, narrowing it to search posts containing"kernel debian" still found 425+ matches, so yeah, like finding a needle in a haystack.

josef.bunes, I asked the same question, more or less, about a year ago. At least you got some replies.
When I asked... {crickets}, until I persisted, asking 3 times. True story.
In that thread, Helpful Harry did try to point me in the right direction, by chiming in with a single-line post which read"/boot/config-3.7-antix-smp"
(or something like that. Made zero sense to me, at the time, thinking"thanksalot. I already know kernel 3.7 is installed...")

When someone else asked same later, in a different thread, anticapitalista pasted a link to
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://kernelnewbies.org"
linktext was:"http://kernelnewbies.org"
====================================

...so I followed the bouncing ball, wheeeee, down the rabbit hole.

========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://kernelnewbies.org/KernelBuild"
linktext was:"http://kernelnewbies.org/KernelBuild"
====================================

If you're trying to see if a bug is fixed, you probably want to duplicate the configuration on your running kernel.
That config file is stored somewhere in /boot/.
There might be several files that start with config, so you want the one associated with your running kernel.
You can find that by running uname -a and finding the config file that ends with your kernel version number.
/boot/config-`uname -r`* .config

On my current antix15 system, it is /boot/config-4.0.5-antix.2-amd64-smp
You can view it in a text editor. The file spans about 6400 lines

To compare/contrast the installed kernel vs"stock debian kernel" or whatever other kernel build, toward deciding
"Why shall I install this one(antix) rather than generic one?"
I suppose you would need to review, side-by-side, their kernel config files (using meld, or kdiff3, or similar program).
Aside from whatever other differences you find, expect to see that quite a few extra drivers for older/esoteric hardware are bundled into the antix kernel.

a related note:
During boot, one of the files consulted by the init script is /etc/init.d/kmod
Here, and in a few other places (vague b/c I'm not yet expert, don't have a full grasp of this) we're able to selectively blacklist modules to prevent them from loading.

another note:
Here's a Loooooooong list of linux kernel boot parameters (boot cheatcodes)

========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt"
linktext was:"https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentatio ... meters.txt"
====================================

skidoo · posted: 2015-10-16 01:59

josef.bunes wrote:What is different from generic kernel? Why shall I install this one(antix) rather than generic one?

Maybe a thread dedicated to this question should be stickied in one of the subforums.
The forum search results for posts containing"kernel" yields 8,000 (or so, I'm exaggerating) results.
Hey, narrowing it to search posts containing"kernel debian" still found 425+ matches, so yeah, like finding a needle in a haystack.

josef.bunes, I asked the same question, more or less, about a year ago. At least you got some replies.
When I asked... {crickets}, until I persisted, asking 3 times. True story.
In that thread, Helpful Harry did try to point me in the right direction, by chiming in with a single-line post which read"/boot/config-3.7-antix-smp"
(or something like that. Made zero sense to me, at the time, thinking"thanksalot. I already know kernel 3.7 is installed...")

When someone else asked same later, in a different thread, anticapitalista pasted a link to
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://kernelnewbies.org"
linktext was:"http://kernelnewbies.org"
====================================

...so I followed the bouncing ball, wheeeee, down the rabbit hole.

========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://kernelnewbies.org/KernelBuild"
linktext was:"http://kernelnewbies.org/KernelBuild"
====================================

If you're trying to see if a bug is fixed, you probably want to duplicate the configuration on your running kernel.
That config file is stored somewhere in /boot/.
There might be several files that start with config, so you want the one associated with your running kernel.
You can find that by running uname -a and finding the config file that ends with your kernel version number.
/boot/config-`uname -r`* .config

On my current antix15 system, it is /boot/config-4.0.5-antix.2-amd64-smp
You can view it in a text editor. The file spans about 6400 lines

To compare/contrast the installed kernel vs"stock debian kernel" or whatever other kernel build, toward deciding
"Why shall I install this one(antix) rather than generic one?"
I suppose you would need to review, side-by-side, their kernel config files (using meld, or kdiff3, or similar program).
Aside from whatever other differences you find, expect to see that quite a few extra drivers for older/esoteric hardware are bundled into the antix kernel.

a related note:
During boot, one of the files consulted by the init script is /etc/init.d/kmod
Here, and in a few other places (vague b/c I'm not yet expert, don't have a full grasp of this) we're able to selectively blacklist modules to prevent them from loading.

another note:
Here's a Loooooooong list of linux kernel boot parameters (boot cheatcodes)

========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt"
linktext was:"https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentatio ... meters.txt"
====================================

skidoo · posted: 2015-10-16 02:00

josef.bunes wrote:What is different from generic kernel? Why shall I install this one(antix) rather than generic one?

Maybe a thread dedicated to this question should be stickied in one of the subforums.
The forum search results for posts containing"kernel" yields 8,000 (or so, I'm exaggerating) results.
Hey, narrowing it to search posts containing"kernel debian" still found 425+ matches, so yeah, like finding a needle in a haystack.

josef.bunes, I asked the same question, more or less, about a year ago. At least you got some replies.
When I asked... {crickets}, until I persisted, asking 3 times. True story.
In that thread, Helpful Harry did try to point me in the right direction, by chiming in with a single-line post which read"/boot/config-3.7-antix-smp"
(or something like that. Made zero sense to me, at the time, thinking"thanksalot. I already know kernel 3.7 is installed...")

When someone else asked same later, in a different thread, anticapitalista pasted a link to
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://kernelnewbies.org"
linktext was:"http://kernelnewbies.org"
====================================

...so I followed the bouncing ball, wheeeee, down the rabbit hole.

========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://kernelnewbies.org/KernelBuild"
linktext was:"http://kernelnewbies.org/KernelBuild"
====================================

If you're trying to see if a bug is fixed, you probably want to duplicate the configuration on your running kernel.
That config file is stored somewhere in /boot/.
There might be several files that start with config, so you want the one associated with your running kernel.
You can find that by running uname -a and finding the config file that ends with your kernel version number.
/boot/config-`uname -r`* .config

On my current antix15 system, it is /boot/config-4.0.5-antix.2-amd64-smp
You can view it in a text editor. The file spans about 6400 lines

To compare/contrast the installed kernel vs"stock debian kernel" or whatever other kernel build, toward deciding
"Why shall I install this one(antix) rather than generic one?"
I suppose you would need to review, side-by-side, their kernel config files (using meld, or kdiff3, or similar program).
Aside from whatever other differences you find, expect to see that quite a few extra drivers for older/esoteric hardware are bundled into the antix kernel.

a related note:
During boot, one of the files consulted by the init script is /etc/init.d/kmod
Here, and in a few other places (vague b/c I'm not yet expert, don't have a full grasp of this) we're able to selectively blacklist modules to prevent them from loading.

another note:
Here's a Loooooooong list of linux kernel boot parameters (boot cheatcodes)

========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt"
linktext was:"https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentatio ... meters.txt"
====================================

skidoo · posted: 2015-10-16 02:13

josef.bunes wrote:What is different from generic kernel? Why shall I install this one(antix) rather than generic one?

Maybe a thread dedicated to this question should be stickied in one of the subforums.
The forum search results for posts containing"kernel" yields 8,000 (or so, I'm exaggerating) results.
Hey, narrowing it to search posts containing"kernel debian" still found 425+ matches, so yeah, like finding a needle in a haystack.

josef.bunes, I asked the same question, more or less, about a year ago. At least you got some replies.
When I asked... {crickets}, until I persisted, asking 3 times. True story.
In that thread, Helpful Harry did try to point me in the right direction, by chiming in with a single-line post which read"/boot/config-3.7-antix-smp"
(or something like that. Made zero sense to me, at the time, thinking"thanksalot. I already know kernel 3.7 is installed...")

When someone else asked same later, in a different thread, anticapitalista pasted a link to
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://kernelnewbies.org"
linktext was:"http://kernelnewbies.org"
====================================

...so I followed the bouncing ball, wheeeee, down the rabbit hole.

========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://kernelnewbies.org/KernelBuild"
linktext was:"http://kernelnewbies.org/KernelBuild"
====================================

If you're trying to see if a bug is fixed, you probably want to duplicate the configuration on your running kernel.
That config file is stored somewhere in /boot/.
There might be several files that start with config, so you want the one associated with your running kernel.
You can find that by running uname -a and finding the config file that ends with your kernel version number.
/boot/config-`uname -r`* .config

On my current antix15 system, it is /boot/config-4.0.5-antix.2-amd64-smp
You can view it in a text editor. The file spans about 6400 lines

To compare/contrast the installed kernel vs"stock debian kernel" or whatever other kernel build, toward deciding
"Why shall I install this one(antix) rather than generic one?"
I suppose you would need to review, side-by-side, their kernel config files (using meld, or kdiff3, or similar program).
Aside from whatever other differences you find, expect to see that quite a few extra drivers for older/esoteric hardware are bundled into the antix kernel.

a related note:
During boot, one of the files consulted by the init script is /etc/init.d/kmod
Here, and in a few other places (vague b/c I'm not yet expert, don't have a full grasp of this) we're able to selectively blacklist modules to prevent them from loading.

another note:
Here's a Loooooooong list of linux kernel boot parameters (boot cheatcodes)

========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt"
linktext was:"https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentatio ... meters.txt"
====================================

rokytnji · posted: 2015-10-16 03:00

Code: Select all

$ inxi -Fxz
System:    Host: biker Kernel: 4.2.1-antix.2-686-pae i686 (32 bit gcc: 4.9.2)
           Desktop: IceWM 1.3.8
           Distro: antiX-15-V_386-full Killah P 30 June 2015
Machine:   System: Dell product: Latitude E4310 v: 0001
           Mobo: Dell model: 0T6M8G v: A01 Bios: Dell v: A03 date: 07/08/2010
CPU:       Dual core Intel Core i5 M 520 (-HT-MCP-) cache: 3072 KB
           flags: (lm nx pae sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 ssse3 vmx) bmips: 9581
           clock speeds: max: 2400 MHz 1: 1199 MHz 2: 1199 MHz 3: 1199 MHz
           4: 1866 MHz
Graphics:  Card: Intel Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller
           bus-ID: 00:02.0
           Display Server: X.Org 1.16.4 drivers: intel (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
           Resolution: 1366x768@60.00hz
           GLX Renderer: Mesa DRI Intel Ironlake Mobile x86/MMX/SSE2
           GLX Version: 2.1 Mesa 10.3.2 Direct Rendering: Yes
Audio:     Card Intel 5 Series/3400 Series High Definition Audio
           driver: snd_hda_intel bus-ID: 00:1b.0
           Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture v: k4.2.1-antix.2-686-pae
Network:   Card-1: Intel 82577LM Gigabit Network Connection
           driver: e1000e v: 3.2.5-k port: 6040 bus-ID: 00:19.0
           IF: eth0 state: down mac: <filter>
           Card-2: Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6200
           driver: iwlwifi bus-ID: 02:00.0
           IF: wlan0 state: up mac: <filter>
Drives:    HDD Total Size: 60.0GB (35.2% used)
           ID-1: /dev/sda model: KINGSTON_SV300S3 size: 60.0GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 7.6G used: 3.7G (52%) fs: ext3 dev: /dev/sda2
           ID-2: /home size: 48G used: 16G (36%) fs: ext3 dev: /dev/sda1
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 50.0C mobo: N/A
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info:      Processes: 151 Uptime: 5 min Memory: 450.7/8027.1MB
           Init: SysVinit runlevel: 5 Gcc sys: 4.9.2
           Client: Shell (bash 4.3.301) inxi: 2.2.28

rokytnji · posted: 2015-10-16 03:13

Code: Select all

harry@biker:~
$ cd /boot
harry@biker:/boot
$ ls
config-3.16.0-4-686-pae
config-3.17-7.dmz.2-liquorix-686-pae
config-4.2.1-antix.2-686-pae
extlinux
grub
initrd.img-3.16.0-4-686-pae
initrd.img-3.17-7.dmz.2-liquorix-686-pae
initrd.img-4.2.1-antix.2-686-pae
memtest86+.bin
memtest86+_multiboot.bin
System.map-3.16.0-4-686-pae
System.map-3.17-7.dmz.2-liquorix-686-pae
System.map-4.2.1-antix.2-686-pae
vmlinuz-3.16.0-4-686-pae
vmlinuz-3.17-7.dmz.2-liquorix-686-pae
vmlinuz-4.2.1-antix.2-686-pae
harry@biker:/boot
$ cat config-4.2.1-antix.2-686-pae

__{{emoticon}}__ or cat 3.16 or 3.17 and look for differences that way.

eugen-b · posted: 2015-11-29 19:38

I wanted to inform that on my Via thin client the Liquorix kernel seems much faster than the antiX kernel. I'm observing especially a difference in how fast I can switch vitrual disktops and how fast web browsing is. I don't know how to measure it in an objective way, if you know - tell me how, but believe me the difference is remarkable. With Liqurix desktop switching, scrolling, link opening goes alsmost instantaneous, with antiX kernel I need up to a second or more. __{{emoticon}}__ I also tested different I/O schedulers on antiX kernel, noop gives a little improvement, but not much. I suspect, that it is the BFQ scheduler on Liquorix which makes the difference. I'll test it with other schedulers, too.

Code: Select all

inxi -F
System:    Host: antiX13 Kernel: 4.3-0.dmz.2-liquorix-686 i686 (32 bit)
           Desktop: Openbox 3.5.2
           Distro: antiX-13.1_386-base Luddite 19 June 2013
Machine:   Mobo: VIA model: VX800 v: 1.0
           Bios: Phoenix v: 6.00 PG date: 09/15/2010
CPU:       Single core VIA Eden (-UP-) cache: 128 KB speed: 1000 MHz (max)
Graphics:  Card: VIA VX800/VX820 Chrome 9 HC3 Integrated Graphics
           Display Server: X.Org 1.12.4 drivers: openchrome (unloaded: fbdev,vesa)
           Resolution: 1366x768@60.0hz
           GLX Renderer: Gallium 0.4 on llvmpipe (LLVM 0x209)
           GLX Version: 2.1 Mesa 8.0.5
Audio:     Card VIA VT8237A/VT8251 HDA Controller driver: snd_hda_intel
           Sound: ALSA v: k4.3-0.dmz.2-liquorix-686
Network:   Card-1: Ralink RT2790 Wireless 802.11n 1T/2R PCIe driver: rt2800pci
           IF: wlan0 state: up mac: 00:15:af:7a:2a:d9
           Card-2: Realtek RTL-8110SC/8169SC Gigabit Ethernet driver: r8169
           IF: eth0 state: down mac: 00:1f:1e:02:63:31
Drives:    HDD Total Size: 36.0GB (37.0% used)
           ID-1: /dev/sda model: LITEONIT_LSS size: 32.0GB
           ID-2: /dev/sdb model: SanDisk_SDCFH size: 4.0GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 30G used: 13G (44%) fs: btrfs dev: /dev/sda1
           ID-2: /home size: 30G used: 13G (44%) fs: btrfs dev: /dev/sda1
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 38.0C mobo: N/A
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info:      Processes: 112 Uptime: 17 min Memory: 392.9/2778.1MB
           Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 2.2.16

Code: Select all

inxi -F
System:    Host: antiX13 Kernel: 4.2.1-antix.2-486-smp i686 (32 bit)
           Desktop: Openbox 3.5.2 Distro: antiX-13.1_386-base Luddite 19 June 2013
Machine:   Mobo: VIA model: VX800 version: 1.0 Bios: Phoenix version: 6.00 PG date: 09/15/2010
CPU:       Single core VIA Eden (-UP-) cache: 128 KB flags: (nx pae sse sse2 sse3) clocked at 1000.00 MHz
Graphics:  Card: VIA VX800/VX820 Chrome 9 HC3 Integrated Graphics
           X.Org: 1.12.4 drivers: openchrome (unloaded: fbdev,vesa) Resolution: 1366x768@60.0hz
           GLX Renderer: Gallium 0.4 on llvmpipe (LLVM 0x209) GLX Version: 2.1 Mesa 8.0.5
Audio:     Card: VIA VT8237A/VT8251 HDA Controller driver: snd_hda_intel Sound: ALSA ver: k4.2.1-antix.2-486-smp
Network:   Card-1: Realtek RTL-8110SC/8169SC Gigabit Ethernet driver: r8169
           IF: eth0 state: down mac: 00:1f:1e:02:63:31
           Card-2: Ralink RT2790 Wireless 802.11n 1T/2R PCIe driver: rt2800pci
           IF: wlan0 state: up mac: 00:15:af:7a:2a:d9
Drives:    HDD Total Size: 36.0GB (4.6% used) 1: id: /dev/sda model: LITEONIT_LSS size: 32.0GB
           2: id: /dev/sdb model: SanDisk_SDCFH size: 4.0GB
Partition: ID: / size: 3.8G used: 1.6G (48%) fs: btrfs
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 37.0C mobo: N/A
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info:      Processes: 109 Uptime: 1 min Memory: 77.4/2779.3MB Client: Shell (bash) inxi: 1.9.9

Aleph · posted: 2015-11-30 08:56

I had to use the 3.7.10 kernel.

The new 4.2.1-antix-legacy seems to work fine for me after a while.

Is this now the best kernel for me hardware?

Thanks.

Code: Select all

$ inxi -Fxz
System:    Host: antix1 Kernel: 4.2.1-antix-legacy.1-486-smp i686 (32 bit gcc: 4.9.2)
           Desktop: IceWM 1.3.8
           Distro: antiX-15-V_386-full Killah P 30 June 2015
Machine:   System: Hewlett-Packard product: HP Compaq nx6310 (RH325ET#ABE) v: F.09
           Mobo: Hewlett-Packard model: 30AA v: KBC Version 58.12
           Bios: Hewlett-Packard v: 68YDU Ver. F.09 date: 09/15/2006
CPU:       Single core Intel Celeron M 430 (-UP-) cache: 1024 KB
           flags: (nx pae sse sse2 sse3) bmips: 3457 speed: 1728 MHz (max)
Graphics:  Card: Intel Mobile 945GM/GMS 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller
           bus-ID: 00:02.0
           Display Server: X.Org 1.16.4 driver: intel
           Resolution: 1024x768@60.00hz
           GLX Renderer: Mesa DRI Intel 945GM x86/MMX/SSE2
           GLX Version: 2.1 Mesa 10.3.2 Direct Rendering: Yes
Audio:     Card Intel NM10/ICH7 Family High Definition Audio Controller
           driver: snd_hda_intel bus-ID: 00:1b.0
           Sound: ALSA v: k4.2.1-antix-legacy.1-486-smp
Network:   Card-1: Broadcom BCM4401-B0 100Base-TX
           driver: b44 v: 2.0 bus-ID: 02:0e.0
           IF: eth0 state: down mac: <filter>
           Card-2: Broadcom BCM4311 802.11b/g WLAN
           driver: b43-pci-bridge bus-ID: 08:00.0
           IF: wlan0 state: up mac: <filter>
Drives:    HDD Total Size: 60.0GB (16.7% used)
           ID-1: /dev/sda model: FUJITSU_MHV2060B size: 60.0GB
Partition: ID-1: / size: 12G used: 5.7G (51%) fs: ext4 dev: /dev/sda1
           ID-2: swap-1 size: 4.19GB used: 0.00GB (0%) fs: swap dev: /dev/sda5
Sensors:   System Temperatures: cpu: 50.0C mobo: 48.0C
           Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info:      Processes: 112 Uptime: 1 min Memory: 252.4/999.3MB
           Init: SysVinit runlevel: 5 Gcc sys: 4.9.2
           Client: Shell (bash 4.3.301) inxi: 2.2.28

Edit:

the Fn keys are not working.