hi,
i installed antix8.2 several times in virtualbox and allways run into the same problems:
its boots very slow (several minutes). After that its also quite slow: if i change the wm it takes about a minute till i may make use of the new wm.
How come? As i didnt read about that problem: may i got a bad download?
(I`ll check booting from cd now, but if i recall correct it was the same problem, even with the fast-boot option).
I aint got that problem with 7.5 or with other distros.
thanks for a tip
edit: No, i was wrong, from live-cd it boots normal ( that is fast). Sorry. So the problem is merley how to run 8.2 inside virtualbox.
topic title: slow boot
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
-
Posts: 38
- Joined: 08 Jun 2009
-
Posts: 1,520
- Joined: 07 Oct 2007
#2
This could be related to you machine directly. What are the specs? A VM ususally takes a fair bit of ram to run smoothly.
-
Posts: 38
- Joined: 08 Jun 2009
#3
Anyone else running 8 or 8.2 in vbox? Else i`ll put it on an usb-stick.
thanks
I dont think thats the problem. ram is about 1.5GB in virtualbox, cpu on host is 1.6GH in virtualbox i dont know. As said: with antiX 7.5 i aint got that problem (au contraire __{{emoticon}}__ ). Even kde4 and other"full" environments run faster in vbox. But it might be in 7.5 has been an option to boot with"parameters" for virtualbox at the boot-menu (i`m not sure).eriefisher wrote:This could be related to you machine directly. What are the specs? A VM ususally takes a fair bit of ram to run smoothly.
Anyone else running 8 or 8.2 in vbox? Else i`ll put it on an usb-stick.
thanks
-
anticapitalista
Posts: 5,955
- Site Admin
- Joined: 11 Sep 2007
#4
VB->Settings->System->Acceleration->enable VT.-x-AMD works for me.
-
Posts: 38
- Joined: 08 Jun 2009
#5
(as said: if it comes to worst i`ll put it on a stick and run 7.5 in vbox))
thanks
ok, i`ll try to modify the settings later and let you know. At least i know now that it should work somehowanticapitalista wrote:VB->Settings->System->Acceleration->enable VT.-x-AMD works for me.
(as said: if it comes to worst i`ll put it on a stick and run 7.5 in vbox))
thanks
-
Posts: 38
- Joined: 08 Jun 2009
#6
no luck; i found the settings you mentioned, but i`m not able to change it (it`s greyed out).
-
Posts: 1,228
- Joined: 15 Jun 2008
#7
Unless you have a cpu that enables hardware virtualisation, like anti proposed, you may have trouble running antiX in VB.
In my pc, antiX crawled rather than ran inside VB but that wasn't really exclusive of it. While some distros and specially Windows ran quite well, sidux, besides being the best live-cd I ever tried, also was impractible. Since I had Ubuntu as host, it may have something to do with both systems trying to use equivalent resources at the same time.
In my pc, antiX crawled rather than ran inside VB but that wasn't really exclusive of it. While some distros and specially Windows ran quite well, sidux, besides being the best live-cd I ever tried, also was impractible. Since I had Ubuntu as host, it may have something to do with both systems trying to use equivalent resources at the same time.
-
Posts: 38
- Joined: 08 Jun 2009
#8
ok. i think i aint got no hardware-virtualisation-cpu, but how may i find out? (btw: for example sidux is of the ones which run o.k.).secipolla wrote:Unless you have a cpu that enables hardware virtualisation, like anti proposed, you may have trouble running antiX in VB.
In my pc, antiX crawled rather than ran inside VB but that wasn't really exclusive of it. While some distros and specially Windows ran quite well, sidux, besides being the best live-cd I ever tried, also was impractible. Since I had Ubuntu as host, it may have something to do with both systems trying to use equivalent resources at the same time.