Would the result be different if I installed with MX Package Installer, is metapackage-installer somehow"bad"? Well, I removed these MX Tools because I didn't need them, but they are definetly useful for people who don't use btrfs snapshot feature or make their own ISOs. I used it when I installed my wireless card as well. But then I uninstalled it and got completely rid of Qt4 as a side effect.Jerry wrote:I find the result just fine: menu is good, bottom panel is set up. It's just waiting for the user to make it his own with normal additions such as a new desktop, etc.The result is not that good, but it works in principle.No need to do that: like I said, just use MX Package Installer, which is already there.First I installed install-meta-mx from Synaptic then installed lxde with it.
My LXDE session is definitely not ready, you're right. Especially when I compare it to some polished LXDE distros. And I don't know for sure whether I will be able to resolve all issues I have with it.
I thought a bit more about a second OS on a second btrfs root subvolume. I don't trust the installers that they will understand that I wand to mount only the subvolume as target
Code: Select all
mount -o remount,subvol=@second /dev/sda1 /target