Hi dear antiX helpers,
I just want to ask which of these browsers is known as needing less ressources? Iceape changed into Seamonkey after installing the german laguage pack. Now I installed Iceweasel, too, to test it on my old computer. I got the impression that it is a little bit faster than Seamonkey, or am I wrong, is it just an imagination?
Greetings,
Susanne
__{{emoticon}}__
topic title: Iceape vs. Iceweasel
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
-
Posts: 30
- Joined: 12 Mar 2011
-
anticapitalista
Posts: 5,955
- Site Admin
- Joined: 11 Sep 2007
#2
I have found iceape to use less RAM than iceweasel especially if/when you open several tabs, but iceweasel to be slightly faster.
iceweasel has one big advantage over iceape IMO. Better language support.
iceweasel has one big advantage over iceape IMO. Better language support.
-
Posts: 31
- Joined: 17 Apr 2010
#3
On the downside I experienced that a lot lesser addons are available for iceape compared to firefox/iceweasel.
-
Posts: 30
- Joined: 12 Mar 2011
#4
Hi anti and atcl,
thank you for your answers. I will stay with iceape/seamonkey for the moment.
Greetings,
Susanne
__{{emoticon}}__
thank you for your answers. I will stay with iceape/seamonkey for the moment.
Greetings,
Susanne
__{{emoticon}}__