topic title: Here I go again
-
Posts: 177
- Joined: 04 Mar 2014
#1
After a few months without Antix 13.2, I'm back for another go at it. I have been using MX-14 on my HP laptop. Works fine but I still miss the lean look and feel of Rox and similar apps. We'll see how this goes. __{{emoticon}}__
-
Posts: 667
- Joined: 01 Nov 2013
#2
You could always set it up as a dual boot and work back and forth between the two.
JD
JD
-
Posts: 177
- Joined: 04 Mar 2014
#3
Oops. I forgot to mention, that's what I did. sda1 is mx14 and sda3 is Antix 13.2.
-
Posts: 177
- Joined: 04 Mar 2014
#5
I have always loved Openbox which is not part of Antix so I can try Fluxbox again. Do you like it better than Openbox overall?
-
Posts: 667
- Joined: 01 Nov 2013
#6
From member xd-0 at archlinux.org forums says
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=39112"
linktext was:"https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=39112"
====================================
OR this one::
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://www.bbs.archbang.org/viewtopic.php?id=1553"
linktext was:"http://www.bbs.archbang.org/viewtopic.php?id=1553"
====================================
That may answer some questions.
Perhaps an old thread, but could help some.
Fluxbox:
*Does some initial configuring of your conf files so you have your programs in the meny etc.
*Configuring is easy with prgms but somewhat shattered.
*Comes with a panel thats easy to configure. The fluxbox themes also automatically theme the panel, making it fit in nicely.
*Resizing windows are'nt as natural as I would like (only bottom handle change size)
Openbox:
*Comes with almost blank configurefiles. Copy the defaults to your homedirectory to modify them. 3 files: menu, autostart and rc. And they are easy to understand.
*Install obconf and openbox is easely configured.
*Does'nt have a panel so you need to install one, and theme it to fit your desktop.
*Naturall interface, feels more slim and natural.
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=39112"
linktext was:"https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=39112"
====================================
OR this one::
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://www.bbs.archbang.org/viewtopic.php?id=1553"
linktext was:"http://www.bbs.archbang.org/viewtopic.php?id=1553"
====================================
That may answer some questions.
-
Posts: 850
- Joined: 26 Jul 2012
#7
@rmcellig
Simple answer = Yes
I used to use it before using any other *box, so have a long time relationship with it, however, I'm not someone who bothers to customize my machines much, change of wallpaper is about all I bother with.
Simple answer = Yes
I used to use it before using any other *box, so have a long time relationship with it, however, I'm not someone who bothers to customize my machines much, change of wallpaper is about all I bother with.
-
Posts: 4,164
- Joined: 20 Feb 2009
#8
While i am the opposite in Fluxbox.
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://i49.tinypic.com/35hlfux.jpg"
linktext was:"LXpanel in Fluxbox"
====================================
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://i49.tinypic.com/w83tp3.jpg"
linktext was:"Wbar in Fluxbox"
====================================
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://i39.tinypic.com/29llnbt.jpg"
linktext was:"Tint2 in Fluxbox"
====================================
See! Even AntiX can make a old scooter tramp jump through hoops like a trained dog.
__{{emoticon}}__
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://i49.tinypic.com/35hlfux.jpg"
linktext was:"LXpanel in Fluxbox"
====================================
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://i49.tinypic.com/w83tp3.jpg"
linktext was:"Wbar in Fluxbox"
====================================
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://i39.tinypic.com/29llnbt.jpg"
linktext was:"Tint2 in Fluxbox"
====================================
See! Even AntiX can make a old scooter tramp jump through hoops like a trained dog.
__{{emoticon}}__
-
Posts: 850
- Joined: 26 Jul 2012
#9
Like your 'Rebel Girl'. __{{emoticon}}__
-
Posts: 177
- Joined: 04 Mar 2014
#11
I'm still using MX-14. Maybe it's me (and I think it is), find that Antix 13.2 is not as easy to configure and set up compared to MX-14.
I just tried Puppy again and still find it a pain when I am looking for applications compared to Antix and MX-14. An example of why I am still using MX-14 is that I am able to use the Samba GUI app that I installed no problem in MX-14 but doesn't seem to be available in Antix (different repos?)
I love the speed and simplicity of ROX as well as Fluxbox and similar boxes. Am I making any sense of just rambling on?
All I have is a HP laptop that is stationary. I have an external keyboard attached to it and never take this laptop anywhere. I really like this.
I think I will reinstall Antix again and see how it goes. I currently have Crunchbang installed mainly because I love Openbox and the tint2 bar. Very simple and fast. I have no problem reinstalling Antix and see how it goes. __{{emoticon}}__
I just tried Puppy again and still find it a pain when I am looking for applications compared to Antix and MX-14. An example of why I am still using MX-14 is that I am able to use the Samba GUI app that I installed no problem in MX-14 but doesn't seem to be available in Antix (different repos?)
I love the speed and simplicity of ROX as well as Fluxbox and similar boxes. Am I making any sense of just rambling on?
All I have is a HP laptop that is stationary. I have an external keyboard attached to it and never take this laptop anywhere. I really like this.
I think I will reinstall Antix again and see how it goes. I currently have Crunchbang installed mainly because I love Openbox and the tint2 bar. Very simple and fast. I have no problem reinstalling Antix and see how it goes. __{{emoticon}}__
-
Posts: 850
- Joined: 26 Jul 2012
#12
That's the beauty of free software, you can do (almost) anything you like. __{{emoticon}}__
If MX14 is for you, that's OK by me, but I have returned to antiX, (I left #! & came here a while ago, nothing wrong with the distro, just personal choice).
I also use BSD, & occasionally SliTaz, they both do all I need of them. Also keeping my eye on Haiku. __{{emoticon}}__
If MX14 is for you, that's OK by me, but I have returned to antiX, (I left #! & came here a while ago, nothing wrong with the distro, just personal choice).
I also use BSD, & occasionally SliTaz, they both do all I need of them. Also keeping my eye on Haiku. __{{emoticon}}__
-
Posts: 177
- Joined: 04 Mar 2014
#13
Well, so far I have my fstab file setup. Now on to Samba.... __{{emoticon}}__
-
Posts: 177
- Joined: 04 Mar 2014
#14
Things are finally looking good. I have samba and my fstab file working great. I installed Openbox as well as tint2. I love using these two apps. Which file do I modify so that I can always default boot into Openbox, Rox and tint2?
-
Posts: 4,164
- Joined: 20 Feb 2009
#15
or make a Backup folder in /home/username and copy and paste original in there. Rox>drag&drop>copy.
Tint2 autostart should be in your openbox startup file? No? It was in my ~/.fluxbox/startup on mine when I ran it.
~/.xinitrc as far as I know. Be sure and make a .xinitrc.old or .xinitrcBK (backup) before making changes if I was yourmcellig wrote:Things are finally looking good. I have samba and my fstab file working great. I installed Openbox as well as tint2. I love using these two apps. Which file do I modify so that I can always default boot into Openbox, Rox and tint2?
or make a Backup folder in /home/username and copy and paste original in there. Rox>drag&drop>copy.
Tint2 autostart should be in your openbox startup file? No? It was in my ~/.fluxbox/startup on mine when I ran it.