I'm aware that when people are writing about a country (say Ukraine, but also China, Russia, Israel, Iran, ...) they are actually discussing USA. This is always a problem, because it is reductionism in its worst form. I understand that not everyone can have a strong education in geography and regional history. I can give a tip how to recognize a bad article about foreign countries using two features:
- names of the countries are used as grammatical subjects and not as territories or locations,
- (last) names of country leaders are used synonymously with country names.

The refusal of work - Workers Committee of Porto Marghera


========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://libcom.org/library/refusal-work-workers-committee-porto-marghera-1970"
linktext was:"https://libcom.org/library/refusal-work ... ghera-1970"
====================================

What does it mean to destroy the bosses’ power? Who are the bosses and what do they want? These seem like stupid questions but in reality they are fundamental to the aim of establishing what political line we have to take to confront the bosses.