You're welcome.
Bet you go back to fluxbox though. __{{emoticon}}__
topic title: fvwm-crystal
-
anticapitalista
Posts: 5,955
- Site Admin
- Joined: 11 Sep 2007
-
Posts: 1,081
- Joined: 29 Sep 2007
#17
I'm sorry that it was so difficult to install fvwm-crystal. I did mostly everything from synaptic:
1. turned off mepis repos
2. updated repos
3. installed fvwm-crystal
4. added this line to the fluxbox menu
5. used the menu to launch fvwm-crystal.
hope things improve for you.
john
1. turned off mepis repos
2. updated repos
3. installed fvwm-crystal
4. added this line to the fluxbox menu
Code: Select all
[restart] (FVWM) {fvwm-crystal}
hope things improve for you.
john
-
anticapitalista
Posts: 5,955
- Site Admin
- Joined: 11 Sep 2007
#18
John
I think the main problem was with setting up the login screen. I also have been trying out fvwm-crystal, and it does work fast on my box.
I'm not sure I like the layout too much, but I guess it can also be configured quite easily.
In some ways it is (at the beginning) more intuitive for a new user than fluxbox, but it is much bigger size-wise ie 19MB download as opposed to just over 1MB for fluxbox and icewm.
I think the main problem was with setting up the login screen. I also have been trying out fvwm-crystal, and it does work fast on my box.
I'm not sure I like the layout too much, but I guess it can also be configured quite easily.
In some ways it is (at the beginning) more intuitive for a new user than fluxbox, but it is much bigger size-wise ie 19MB download as opposed to just over 1MB for fluxbox and icewm.
-
Posts: 316
- Joined: 26 Oct 2007
#19
But, i'll keep it on here for now so i can have a good look at it & try different things out etc.
Fluxbox is definitely faster though. It's VERY snappy & responsive, even on this old PIII Celeron (600Mhz) with 128mb Ram.
Heehee, i'm already thinking about it. __{{emoticon}}__ I really like some of the things about fvwm-crystal, but there's also a lot that i'm not keen on. I do find fluxbox (& openbox for that matter) very configurable, & quite easily as well.anticapitalista wrote:You're welcome.
Bet you go back to fluxbox though. __{{emoticon}}__
But, i'll keep it on here for now so i can have a good look at it & try different things out etc.
Fluxbox is definitely faster though. It's VERY snappy & responsive, even on this old PIII Celeron (600Mhz) with 128mb Ram.
-
Posts: 180
- Joined: 04 Dec 2007