Part of my conky setup looks like this:
${color}battery: ${battery_percent BAT1}%
${color}AC adapter: ${color}$acpiacadapter
The battery shows up OK but the on-screen message about the adapter is"no ac_adapters?"
another slight problem may be that:
$ acpi -bai
shows the following:
Battery 0: Charging, 74%, 01:22:25 until charged
Battery 0: design capacity 4726 mAh, last full capacity 4231 mAh = 89%
Adapter 0: on-line
I've tried using BAT0 in conky but conky doesn't recognise it & it makes no difference to the status of the adapter.
I can't help thinking I'm missing something obvious. Any ideas?
dmk
topic title: Conky doesn't appear to recognise my AC adapter
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
-
Posts: 137
- Joined: 19 Sep 2012
-
Posts: 4,164
- Joined: 20 Feb 2009
#2
My 3 conky lines in my EEEPC for battery are as follows
That works for me but I am using AntiX 8.5 still on that EEEPC 701SD netbook.
My conky thread : 701sd-conky-with-temps-fanspeed-battery-link-strength-t2618.html
I would go to the second page because my conkyrc file has evolved since initial install.
Code: Select all
${color}Bat:${battery BAT0}
${alignr}${battery_bar 6,200 BAT0}
${battery_time BAT0}
My conky thread : 701sd-conky-with-temps-fanspeed-battery-link-strength-t2618.html
I would go to the second page because my conkyrc file has evolved since initial install.
-
Posts: 279
- Joined: 17 Oct 2009
#3
Also check out this old post.
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"antix.freeforu ms.org/post16119.html"
linktext was:"antix.freeforu ms.org/post16119.html"
====================================
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"antix.freeforu ms.org/post16119.html"
linktext was:"antix.freeforu ms.org/post16119.html"
====================================
-
Posts: 137
- Joined: 19 Sep 2012
#4
Thanks, I'll have a look - and Roky, I'm running antiX on a (by now) venerable, 3/4(?) yr old Dell netbook. What you have to say is probably right up my street!
dmk
dmk
-
Posts: 137
- Joined: 19 Sep 2012
#5
Ah! Actually these are all about the battery - the reports from that are fine. The problem is with the AC adapter. Because I have the habit of a) plugging the adapter into the mains and forgetting to turn the mains 'on' or b) attaching the cable to the netbook but neglecting to plug it into the wall - an on-screen indication of what I'm doing would be useful.
-
Posts: 137
- Joined: 19 Sep 2012
#6
Still struggling with this! Trawled WWW, found a lot of stuff on Linux Questions but nothing relevant (someone called rokytnji seems to be the King of Conk there - sounds familiar?), tried acpi=force - nbg (no bloody good) but dug up a couple of ref's in antiX
1) $ acpi --help
-p, --proc use old proc interface instead of new sys interface
so ran (with acpi=force):
$ acpi -baip # and got:
No support for device type: battery
No support for device type: ac_adapter
Off to /proc to see what I could find:
root@antiX1:/home/dmk-antiX
# alf /proc/acpi
total 0
dr-xr-xr-x 3 root root 0 Nov 7 09:54 button/
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Nov 7 09:54 wakeup
root@antiX1:/home/dmk-antiX
# cat /proc/acpi/wakeup
Device S-state Status Sysfs node
LID0 S3 *enabled
HDEF S4 *disabled pci:0000:00:1b.0
PXS1 S4 *disabled
PXS2 S4 *disabled pci:0000:03:00.0
PXS3 S3 *enabled pci:0000:04:00.0
PXS4 S4 *disabled
PXS5 S4 *disabled
PXS6 S4 *disabled
USB1 S0 *enabled pci:0000:00:1d.0
USB2 S0 *enabled pci:0000:00:1d.1
USB3 S0 *enabled pci:0000:00:1d.2
USB4 S0 *enabled pci:0000:00:1d.3
USB7 S0 *enabled pci:0000:00:1d.7
SLT0 S4 *disabled
SLT1 S4 *disabled
SLT2 S4 *disabled
SLT3 S4 *disabled
SLT6 S4 *disabled
root@antiX1:/home/dmk-antiX
# alf /proc/acpi/button
total 0
dr-xr-xr-x 3 root root 0 Nov 7 09:55 lid/
root@antiX1:/home/dmk-antiX
# alf /proc/acpi/button/lid
total 0
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Nov 7 09:55 LID0/
root@antiX1:/home/dmk-antiX
# alf /proc/acpi/button/lid/LID0/
total 0
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Nov 7 09:55 state
root@antiX1:/home/dmk-antiX
# cat /proc/acpi/button/lid/LID0/state
state: open
All of which means nothing to me - and, anyway, being a modernista I would prefer the 'new' interface.
???????????????????????????????????????
2) /usr/share/doc/acpi/README:
please include a tar file of /proc/acpi or /sys/class depending on the
interface you used.
And that led to:
$ alf /sys/class/power_supply/
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Nov 4 08:40 ACAD -> ../../devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/PNP0A08:00/device:2f/ACPI0003:00/power_supply/ACAD/
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Nov 4 08:40 BAT1 -> ../../devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/PNP0A08:00/device:2f/PNP0C0A:00/power_supply/BAT1/
and, eventually, here:
# alf /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM\:00/device:00/PNP0A08\:00/device:2f/ACPI0003\:00/power_supply/ACAD/
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Nov 7 09:15 power/
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Nov 7 09:15 device -> ../../../ACPI0003:00/
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 4.0K Nov 7 09:00 online
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Nov 7 09:15 subsystem -> ../../../../../../../../class/power_supply/
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 4.0K Nov 7 09:00 type
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4.0K Nov 7 09:15 uevent
I can't help thinking that the answer's in here somewhere but - no Indiana Jones me - I confess to being cold, lonely, hungry & discouraged. It would be nice if someone (preferably a beautiful young woman) would arrive & give me a hand out of here.
dmk
antiX on a Dell Inspiron 1011 netbook
1) $ acpi --help
-p, --proc use old proc interface instead of new sys interface
so ran (with acpi=force):
$ acpi -baip # and got:
No support for device type: battery
No support for device type: ac_adapter
Off to /proc to see what I could find:
root@antiX1:/home/dmk-antiX
# alf /proc/acpi
total 0
dr-xr-xr-x 3 root root 0 Nov 7 09:54 button/
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Nov 7 09:54 wakeup
root@antiX1:/home/dmk-antiX
# cat /proc/acpi/wakeup
Device S-state Status Sysfs node
LID0 S3 *enabled
HDEF S4 *disabled pci:0000:00:1b.0
PXS1 S4 *disabled
PXS2 S4 *disabled pci:0000:03:00.0
PXS3 S3 *enabled pci:0000:04:00.0
PXS4 S4 *disabled
PXS5 S4 *disabled
PXS6 S4 *disabled
USB1 S0 *enabled pci:0000:00:1d.0
USB2 S0 *enabled pci:0000:00:1d.1
USB3 S0 *enabled pci:0000:00:1d.2
USB4 S0 *enabled pci:0000:00:1d.3
USB7 S0 *enabled pci:0000:00:1d.7
SLT0 S4 *disabled
SLT1 S4 *disabled
SLT2 S4 *disabled
SLT3 S4 *disabled
SLT6 S4 *disabled
root@antiX1:/home/dmk-antiX
# alf /proc/acpi/button
total 0
dr-xr-xr-x 3 root root 0 Nov 7 09:55 lid/
root@antiX1:/home/dmk-antiX
# alf /proc/acpi/button/lid
total 0
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Nov 7 09:55 LID0/
root@antiX1:/home/dmk-antiX
# alf /proc/acpi/button/lid/LID0/
total 0
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 0 Nov 7 09:55 state
root@antiX1:/home/dmk-antiX
# cat /proc/acpi/button/lid/LID0/state
state: open
All of which means nothing to me - and, anyway, being a modernista I would prefer the 'new' interface.
???????????????????????????????????????
2) /usr/share/doc/acpi/README:
please include a tar file of /proc/acpi or /sys/class depending on the
interface you used.
And that led to:
$ alf /sys/class/power_supply/
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Nov 4 08:40 ACAD -> ../../devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/PNP0A08:00/device:2f/ACPI0003:00/power_supply/ACAD/
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Nov 4 08:40 BAT1 -> ../../devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/PNP0A08:00/device:2f/PNP0C0A:00/power_supply/BAT1/
and, eventually, here:
# alf /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM\:00/device:00/PNP0A08\:00/device:2f/ACPI0003\:00/power_supply/ACAD/
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Nov 7 09:15 power/
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Nov 7 09:15 device -> ../../../ACPI0003:00/
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 4.0K Nov 7 09:00 online
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Nov 7 09:15 subsystem -> ../../../../../../../../class/power_supply/
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 4.0K Nov 7 09:00 type
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4.0K Nov 7 09:15 uevent
I can't help thinking that the answer's in here somewhere but - no Indiana Jones me - I confess to being cold, lonely, hungry & discouraged. It would be nice if someone (preferably a beautiful young woman) would arrive & give me a hand out of here.
dmk
antiX on a Dell Inspiron 1011 netbook
-
Posts: 4,164
- Joined: 20 Feb 2009
#7
__{{emoticon}}__ Sorry bro. All ya got is me. Do you have lm-sensors and run sensors detect yet. acpitool was another I needed installed.
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://packages.debian.org/stable/acpitool"
linktext was:"http://packages.debian.org/stable/acpitool"
====================================
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://wiki.debian.org/ACPI"
linktext was:"http://wiki.debian.org/ACPI"
====================================
Looks like BAT1 is in there somewhere.
That covers whether I have the charger unplugged or not. The Battery time remaining line covers that. You might want to use BAT1 instead of Bat0 though. Good luck __{{emoticon}}__
I can't help thinking that the answer's in here somewhere but - no Indiana Jones me - I confess to being cold, lonely, hungry & discouraged. It would be nice if someone (preferably a beautiful young woman) would arrive & give me a hand out of here
__{{emoticon}}__ Sorry bro. All ya got is me. Do you have lm-sensors and run sensors detect yet. acpitool was another I needed installed.
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://packages.debian.org/stable/acpitool"
linktext was:"http://packages.debian.org/stable/acpitool"
====================================
Code: Select all
$ apt-cache policy lm-sensors
lm-sensors:
Installed: 1:3.3.2-2
Candidate: 1:3.3.2-2
Version table:
*** 1:3.3.2-2 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://wiki.debian.org/ACPI"
linktext was:"http://wiki.debian.org/ACPI"
====================================
Looks like BAT1 is in there somewhere.
Code: Select all
$alf /sys/class/power_supply/
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Nov 4 08:40 BAT1 -> ../../devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/PNP0A08:00/device:2f/PNP0C0A:00/power_supply/BAT1
post26691.html#p26691Ah! Actually these are all about the battery - the reports from that are fine. The problem is with the AC adapter. Because I have the habit of a) plugging the adapter into the mains and forgetting to turn the mains 'on' or b) attaching the cable to the netbook but neglecting to plug it into the wall - an on-screen indication of what I'm doing would be useful.
That covers whether I have the charger unplugged or not. The Battery time remaining line covers that. You might want to use BAT1 instead of Bat0 though. Good luck __{{emoticon}}__
-
Posts: 137
- Joined: 19 Sep 2012
#8
I'm giving up on this. Having done a thoro' trawl this is not a problem unique to me. As Roky says, the most important thing is the report on the battery level which is fine.
It just bugs me that the $acpiacadapter doesn't work - altho' I can get the information thru' acpi -a on the terminal.
dmk
PS. Roky, thanks for your help and for my lovely assistant.
It just bugs me that the $acpiacadapter doesn't work - altho' I can get the information thru' acpi -a on the terminal.
dmk
PS. Roky, thanks for your help and for my lovely assistant.