Posts: 26
terrybull
Joined: 01 Jul 2011
#1
I am trying Antix 15 on a Panasonic cf27 toughbook. The screen resolution loads at 1024 X 768 which means it is too large and only shows part of the desktop. Can I change it to 800x 600 please.
anticapitalista
Posts: 5,955
Site Admin
Joined: 11 Sep 2007
#2
Running live or installed?

If live type in vga=788 at boot menu

If installed - In antix control centre - Set Screen Resolution
Posts: 2,238
dolphin_oracle
Joined: 16 Dec 2007
#3
terrybull wrote:I am trying Antix 15 on a Panasonic cf27 toughbook. The screen resolution loads at 1024 X 768 which means it is too large and only shows part of the desktop. Can I change it to 800x 600 please.
the control center >session > set resolution app can change the resolution, but it won't stick on reboot. In the menus of the app is an option to generate a script with the new settings. generate the script then run it from your startup file, and the resolution will be set every login.
Posts: 26
terrybull
Joined: 01 Jul 2011
#4
I've been busy on other things and just getting back to this. I have installed and when I go to session set screen res I get asked for root password which I type in and get nothing. Just back to control centre again. Help please.
dolphin_oracle
Posts: 2,238
dolphin_oracle
Joined: 16 Dec 2007
#5
terrybull wrote:I've been busy on other things and just getting back to this. I have installed and when I go to session set screen res I get asked for root password which I type in and get nothing. Just back to control centre again. Help please.
I do believe its actually asking for your user password. Try that.
Posts: 26
terrybull
Joined: 01 Jul 2011
#6
You were correct (as usual). However the resolution has changed but it looks awful. Like a fog over the screen and quite dim. Going back to 1024 X 768 it remains dim. The brightness is full.
Posts: 2,238
dolphin_oracle
Joined: 16 Dec 2007
#7
terrybull wrote:You were correct (as usual). However the resolution has changed but it looks awful. Like a fog over the screen and quite dim. Going back to 1024 X 768 it remains dim. The brightness is full.
well, you can try a different color depth. i don't know much about those machines. Roky I think used to run toughbooks.
Posts: 4,164
rokytnji
Joined: 20 Feb 2009
#8
Mine is a CF-48 which I still have.

Code: Select all

xrandr
was my friend.

Code: Select all

xrandr -s 800x600
for a test run. If happy. Use that line in your startup.

Edit: I had to change out my LCD cable from inverter to back of lcd screen. Panasonics are not as tough as they advertise.


========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://oi47.tinypic.com/nbybsj.jpg"
linktext was:"http://oi47.tinypic.com/nbybsj.jpg"
====================================


Slapping side of screen would sometimes clear the screen of cloudiness. Replacing screen cable fixed it for good.
I really like mx
Moved thread to MX-15 Fusion so it gets the attention it deserves.
Last edited by rokytnji on 29 Jan 2016, 12:08, edited 1 time in total.
Posts: 26
terrybull
Joined: 01 Jul 2011
#9
I'll try that. There is nothing wrong with the laptop screen, physically I mean. This is a software issue. I really like mx but this machine doesn't quite have the 'legs' to make it a practical option.
Posts: 452
Jerry
Joined: 12 Sep 2007
#10
I really like mx but this machine doesn't quite have the 'legs' to make it a practical option.
That's interesting. Can you please post the output of

Code: Select all

inxi -F
Posts: 26
terrybull
Joined: 01 Jul 2011
#11
I've uninstalled antix at the moment as I couldn't get get the screen correct. I'll put a spare HDD in and do a inxi -F soon as I get chance. This toughbook only has a Pentium M 300mhz and 256 mb ram.
Posts: 4,164
rokytnji
Joined: 20 Feb 2009
#12
Pentium M 300mhz and 256 mb ram.
Sounds like MX is not for you. If I was in your shoes. I'd bump up the ram. On my CF-48. I bumped the ram to 1.2 gig.
My Pentium M cpu on it is a P4 also. Yours looks to be a P2.
I run AntiX 15 on it instead of MX-15 on it out of personal preference on my part.
Sounds like you need to rethink a few things.
Because your specs are woefully low.


========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://forum.notebookreview.com/threads/the-toughbook-cf-27-owners-thread.708213/"
linktext was:"http://forum.notebookreview.com/threads ... ad.708213/"
====================================


Since I do not know your location or financial situation. If I was in your shoes. I'd sell/craiglist the cf-27 after putting Windows XP on it. Then use the 20 bucks or whatever I got for it to upgrade to this instead.


========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://www.ebay.com/itm/Itronix-General-Dynamics-GD6000-Core-2-Duo-2-53GHz-4GB-RAM-120-160GB-HDD-/231822576747?hash=item35f9b3cc6b:g:lCUAAOSwv-NWaY9t"
linktext was:"Link"
====================================


Because that will be cheaper than upgrading that CF-27. Hell. I might sell my CF-48 or IBM T23 and use what funds I get for those to do this myself (in another auction, of course).

They are good units. I speak from experience because
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://www.ebay.com/itm/SAVE-200-ON-RUGGED-ITRONIX-T5200-HANDHELD-PC-TOUCHSCREEEN-WIRELESS-SOFTWARE-/201490128508?hash=item2ee9bf5e7c:g:MPwAAOSweW5Vcgkm"
linktext was:"this was my 1st computer."
====================================

It was stolen out of my pickup truck way back when in 2008.
It recieved internet off of a ,
Since Itronix considers itself a leader and expert in wireless communications, it comes as no surprise that the T5200 was designed from the ground up as a wireless communication device. Shielding is always an issue when you integrate a wireless radio into a computing device, and Itronix took that into consideration. Depending on a customer's needs, there is a variety of wireless radio options using either ARDIS or the BellSouth Wireless Data network. Units equipped with a wireless radio also have a flip-up antenna in the left screen hinge.
I would not how ever buy a T5200 now. Though rugged and tough. They are woe fully like your CF-27 when it comes to internal specs. Just a museum piece now, or hobby gear. I loved how the battery would hold a charge for 2 days though.
Processor PR31700 RISC/73.7MHz
OS Windows CE 2.0 and higher
Memory 16-32MB RAM, 16MB Flash
Display 7.3" 640 x 240 mono backlit LCD
Digitizer Pressure-sensitive panel
Storage System RAM
Size 9.8 x 5.0 x 2.2 inches
Weight 3.0 lbs (base unit including battery pack)
Power Li-Ion 1,500mAh
Posts: 26
terrybull
Joined: 01 Jul 2011
#13
I can't up the ram as this is the max the bios will recognise. I do have other laptops but trying to get this running stuff is a challenge and sort of hobby in itself plus I learn. It really wont run xp even. I am typing this using Antix 8.5 which runs brilliantly on it.
Posts: 26
terrybull
Joined: 01 Jul 2011
#14
I note that this thread has been moved to the MX forum but I don't think it should have been as it is specifically an Antix 15 issue. I can and have used MX on this machine but it is just a little too resource hungry for its feeble specs. Antix 8.5 runs brilliantly on it but is well out of date. Anyway for the time being I am using antix 13.2 which is fine. I cannot get past the screen resolution issue with version 15 though but my Linux knowledge is really basic.