i have installed antix15 on (sda1) and also added antix15 unpacked iso as a frugal install menu entry on (sda2)
if i boot antix15 frugal i can install it on sda1
but if i boot antix16 as a frugal also from sda2 i cant install to sda1
at option 1a, choose disk for installation, i cant select anything, on 15 i could see the hdd
on next page option 2a (root) partition, in the select box it says: partition info fatal error: device /dev/ is not a block device
is this a bug or a feature?
is there any major architecture change in antix 16 that could cause this?
how it mounts stuff or something?
i use this feature (install on the same hdd) as a backup to use or reinstall the os on some old pcs wich boot slow from usb
and obviously to show people the superiority of linux in general and antix in particular, since not all distros have all these features
live,frugal,repair,recover,imge(clone),install from hdd
thank you for your hard work
topic title: cant install from same hdd
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
-
Posts: 73
- Joined: 20 Jan 2014
-
Posts: 1,445
- Joined: 09 Feb 2012
#2
maybe reading these topics again will jog your memory
couple-of-questions-t5154.html
adding-frugal-install-menuentry-t6301.html
grub-help-t6102.html
"is there any major architecture change in antix 16 that could cause this?"
I don't think so. If there is, I've never noticed.
couple-of-questions-t5154.html
adding-frugal-install-menuentry-t6301.html
grub-help-t6102.html
"is there any major architecture change in antix 16 that could cause this?"
I don't think so. If there is, I've never noticed.
-
Posts: 73
- Joined: 20 Jan 2014
#3
what do you mean ?
i was asking about some feature working in antix15 and NOT working in antix16
i was asking about some feature working in antix15 and NOT working in antix16
-
skidooskidooPosts: 1,445
- Joined: 09 Feb 2012
#4
jog your memory == if you got it working previously but now can't recall the steps, revisiting your earlier posts could be helpful
Maybe your antiX16 bootline specifies mount=all, but your earlier bootline did not, and installer ignores currently mounted partitions?
I'm grabbing at straws. Is the target drive unmounted when you launch the installer?at option 1a, choose disk for installation, i cant select anything, on 15 i could see the hdd
Maybe your antiX16 bootline specifies mount=all, but your earlier bootline did not, and installer ignores currently mounted partitions?
-
Posts: 73
- Joined: 20 Jan 2014
#5
i double checked on 2 systems
heres the thing i have a grub entry pointing to /sda2/antix
and i just change files
antix15 and antix16
they both boot correctly
first partition is not mounted in both
in 16 i cant install
but,like i said it somehow doesent see the target, there is an error
heres the thing i have a grub entry pointing to /sda2/antix
and i just change files
antix15 and antix16
they both boot correctly
first partition is not mounted in both
in 16 i cant install
but,like i said it somehow doesent see the target, there is an error
-
Posts: 1,445
- Joined: 09 Feb 2012
#6
I guess it must have been that.
partition-info is a system command employer by the installer
How large is your intended target partition?
Asking because the installer currently rejects partitions smaller than 4Gb
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://github.com/anticapitalista/MX-installer/blob/master/minstall.cpp#L2344"
linktext was:"https://github.com/anticapitalista/MX-i ... .cpp#L2344"
====================================
Anyhow, I did find a couple of committed changes which occurred after antiX15 release which may have introduced a bug:
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://github.com/anticapitalista/MX-installer/commit/a356755c6ab89278a3dfcdbc9c148e0f735c32f9"
linktext was:"https://github.com/anticapitalista/MX-i ... 0f735c32f9"
====================================
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://github.com/anticapitalista/MX-installer/commit/d8857635b99210f13a569dbae011321c045295a4"
linktext was:"https://github.com/anticapitalista/MX-i ... 1c045295a4"
====================================
I'll ask Adrian, the installer author, to followup.
was it actually partition-info fatal error: device /dev/ is not a block devicepartition info fatal error: device /dev/ is not a block device
I guess it must have been that.
partition-info is a system command employer by the installer
How large is your intended target partition?
Asking because the installer currently rejects partitions smaller than 4Gb
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://github.com/anticapitalista/MX-installer/blob/master/minstall.cpp#L2344"
linktext was:"https://github.com/anticapitalista/MX-i ... .cpp#L2344"
====================================
Anyhow, I did find a couple of committed changes which occurred after antiX15 release which may have introduced a bug:
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://github.com/anticapitalista/MX-installer/commit/a356755c6ab89278a3dfcdbc9c148e0f735c32f9"
linktext was:"https://github.com/anticapitalista/MX-i ... 0f735c32f9"
====================================
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://github.com/anticapitalista/MX-installer/commit/d8857635b99210f13a569dbae011321c045295a4"
linktext was:"https://github.com/anticapitalista/MX-i ... 1c045295a4"
====================================
I'll ask Adrian, the installer author, to followup.
-
Posts: 73
- Joined: 20 Jan 2014
#7
partitions are bigger than 30gb
i thought installer was some scripting language bash/perl not c
i thought installer was some scripting language bash/perl not c
-
Posts: 1,445
- Joined: 09 Feb 2012
#8
See the red text in my post above?
This link will show you the exact line (within partition-info) where the error is triggered:
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://github.com/antiX-Linux/partition-info/blob/master/partition-info#L259"
linktext was:"https://github.com/antiX-Linux/partitio ... -info#L259"
====================================
I contacted Adrian, who replied"yeahbut... partition-info is BitJam's script". So, I've PMed BitJam and asked him to visit this topic.
This link will show you the exact line (within partition-info) where the error is triggered:
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://github.com/antiX-Linux/partition-info/blob/master/partition-info#L259"
linktext was:"https://github.com/antiX-Linux/partitio ... -info#L259"
====================================
I contacted Adrian, who replied"yeahbut... partition-info is BitJam's script". So, I've PMed BitJam and asked him to visit this topic.
-
Posts: 1,445
- Joined: 09 Feb 2012
#9
Months later, revisiting because zimp has referenced this topic, I notice the linked line number is no longer accurate"#L259" so, to clarify, am pasting the suspect portion of the code
The reported error message partition-info fatal error: device /dev/ is not a block device
suggests that the string passed as an argument in the call to `partition-info` is, literally, a 5-character string"/dev/"
The reported error message partition-info fatal error: device /dev/ is not a block device
suggests that the string passed as an argument in the call to `partition-info` is, literally, a 5-character string"/dev/"
// disk selection changed, rebuild dropdown menus
void MInstall::on_diskCombo_activated(QString)
{
QString drv = QString("/dev/%1").arg(diskCombo->currentText().section("", 0, 0));
rootCombo->clear();
swapCombo->clear();
homeCombo->clear();
swapCombo->addItem("none - or existing");
homeCombo->addItem("root");
removedItem ="";
// build rootCombo
QStringList partitions = getCmdOuts(QString("partition-info -n --exclude=all --min-size=4000 %1").arg(drv));
rootCombo->addItems(partitions);
if (partitions.size() == 0) {
rootCombo->addItem("none");
}