When I first installed AntiX back in February 2013, I wasted no time at all in upgrading from Sid. Granted, AntiX is excellent as a Debian Testing-based distro. But Sid has been so tamed as of late that it's almost a joke that it's still consider an"unstable'" branch of Debian.
And beside, a Debian Sid-based AntiX is too great of an opportunity not to used. __{{emoticon}}__
topic title: As of April 2013, who is still upgrading from Sid?
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
-
Posts: 45
- Joined: 03 Apr 2013
-
anticapitalista
Posts: 5,955
- Site Admin
- Joined: 11 Sep 2007
#2
I have been using antiX Sid since 2006.
-
Posts: 609
- Joined: 02 Jun 2008
#3
same here. i run sid for several years now and i also use packages from experimental. when wheezy is out, the fun begins. from my experience i look out for xorg, perl, python and drivers updates, especially graphic cards. the rest are minor and can be fixed with a simple downgrade.
-
TonyVanDamTonyVanDamPosts: 45
- Joined: 03 Apr 2013
#4
The last time I mess around with debian experimental, I was using LMDE at the time. Even when I played it safe with"apt-get upgrade", there was an issue with a few missing icons in the menu. And I can not stand a too imperfect menu! __{{emoticon}}__ __{{emoticon}}__dark-D wrote:same here. i run sid for several years now and i also use packages from experimental. when wheezy is out, the fun begins. from my experience i look out for xorg, perl, python and drivers updates, especially graphic cards. the rest are minor and can be fixed with a simple downgrade.
-
Posts: 1,139
- Joined: 26 Apr 2008
#5
Any recent hiccups? I am pretty certain I had some package conflicts a few weeks ago, so I have been holding off on doing Sid updates for a few weeks, maybe a month or so. Anyone know if"the coast is clear" now? ie, relatively safe to do a Sid dist-upgrade without getting package conflicts.
I actually broke a spare Debian Sid instance a few weeks ago; no networking, so that necessitates a reinstall on that particular system, something I want to avoid on other systems; that one was a test system only, fortunately.
I actually broke a spare Debian Sid instance a few weeks ago; no networking, so that necessitates a reinstall on that particular system, something I want to avoid on other systems; that one was a test system only, fortunately.
-
anticapitalista
Posts: 5,955
- Site Admin
- Joined: 11 Sep 2007
#6
The only issue I'm having is with gtk3 themes. A letest upgrade breaks the default zukitwo theme (some apps do not open eg file-roller to open an xz file), but I installed a new theme and all appears to be ok.
I uploded 3 themes to the antiX repo.
adwaita-themes, gnome-cupertino-themes and mediterranean-themes.
I uploded 3 themes to the antiX repo.
adwaita-themes, gnome-cupertino-themes and mediterranean-themes.
-
Posts: 45
- Joined: 03 Apr 2013
#7
As a side note, the current Debian Testing (Jessie) is very stable thus far.
For the moment (6/3/2013), too many critical bug & grave bug reports are enough for me to stay away from Debian Sid repos for the time being. But if anyone is in a good mood to"throw all cautions in the wind", please consider using AntiX instead of Debian.masinick wrote:Any recent hiccups? I am pretty certain I had some package conflicts a few weeks ago, so I have been holding off on doing Sid updates for a few weeks, maybe a month or so. Anyone know if"the coast is clear" now? ie, relatively safe to do a Sid dist-upgrade without getting package conflicts.
I actually broke a spare Debian Sid instance a few weeks ago; no networking, so that necessitates a reinstall on that particular system, something I want to avoid on other systems; that one was a test system only, fortunately.
As a side note, the current Debian Testing (Jessie) is very stable thus far.
-
Posts: 45
- Joined: 03 Apr 2013
#8
And what a difference four months makes! __{{emoticon}}__ Back in February 2013, Sid was well-behaved. But since May 2013, it's been a total donkey on steroids. Good thing for Synaptic, that's all I can say. __{{emoticon}}__
-
Posts: 4,164
- Joined: 20 Feb 2009
#9
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://edos.debian.net/weather/"
linktext was:"http://edos.debian.net/weather/"
====================================
is a nice thing to check out once in a while.
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://edos.debian.net/weather/weather.php?distro=unstable&arch=amd64"
linktext was:"http://edos.debian.net/weather/weather. ... arch=amd64"
====================================
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://edos.debian.net/edos-debcheck/results/unstable/latest/amd64/list.php"
linktext was:"http://edos.debian.net/edos-debcheck/re ... 4/list.php"
====================================
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://edos.debian.net/weather/"
linktext was:"http://edos.debian.net/weather/"
====================================
is a nice thing to check out once in a while.
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://edos.debian.net/weather/weather.php?distro=unstable&arch=amd64"
linktext was:"http://edos.debian.net/weather/weather. ... arch=amd64"
====================================
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://edos.debian.net/edos-debcheck/results/unstable/latest/amd64/list.php"
linktext was:"http://edos.debian.net/edos-debcheck/re ... 4/list.php"
====================================
-
Posts: 1,139
- Joined: 26 Apr 2008
#10
But I've been using Sid in one form or another since late 2001; Libranet was the first Debian-based distribution that helped me"tame" Debian. I had a really old one, probably Potato, that I was trying back then, and it wasn't working very well because the drivers were too old. Libranet got me in, then I learned Debian well.
By the time antiX came along, I had been using Debian about five years already, and Sid for most of that time.
I've been using antiX Core with Sid since the very first Alpha build of Core became available; when was that, 2009-2010 or around that time? Without looking at our builds and forum notes, I cannot remember any more.anticapitalista wrote:I have been using antiX Sid since 2006.
But I've been using Sid in one form or another since late 2001; Libranet was the first Debian-based distribution that helped me"tame" Debian. I had a really old one, probably Potato, that I was trying back then, and it wasn't working very well because the drivers were too old. Libranet got me in, then I learned Debian well.
By the time antiX came along, I had been using Debian about five years already, and Sid for most of that time.