I recently installed AntiX on a Thinkpad 570E, a very old but nice machine with 192Mb RAM and a 10Gb (I think, may be 12Gb) disk. Linux boots and seems to run OK, but the disk size is reported as 40Gb, much larger than the actual size. This has happened with more than one Linux installation on this machine so I suspect the issue is deeper down than the specific distro, but as AntiX is the current OS I hope you'll be able to help.
Windows XP, the previous OS for this machine, knew the right disk size, so I assume the basic hardware and firmware are OK.
Is it possible to correct the disk size by convincing Linux that the disk is smaller than it thinks - and are the consequences as worrying as I suspect they might be if I do nothing and hit the 10Gb physical maximum?
AntiX reports larger disk size than reality: advice, please
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
- Posts: 3 PDW42
- Joined: 05 Mar 2017
- Posts: 4,164 rokytnji
- Joined: 20 Feb 2009
#2
Post a
and a
and if you wanna. Take a screenshot of Gparted being open also on your machine and post the it in your next thread.
Use full editor reply button on the reply box. When using antix screenshot utility . Use the custom from the drop down menu and highlight around gparted window and let go of the mouse left click button.
You'll figure it out. Howdy and Welcome.
Code: Select all
inxi -Fxz
Code: Select all
sudo parted -l
Use full editor reply button on the reply box. When using antix screenshot utility . Use the custom from the drop down menu and highlight around gparted window and let go of the mouse left click button.
You'll figure it out. Howdy and Welcome.
- Posts: 850 fatmac
- Joined: 26 Jul 2012
#3
You sure you didn't upgrade your disk - 10GB (or even 20GB) disks went out of fashion a long time ago........if it isn't too much of a problem, just open up the drive bay & check on the disk itself.
- Posts: 3 PDW42
- Joined: 05 Mar 2017
#4
fatmac:"You sure you didn't upgrade your disk - 10GB (or even 20GB) disks went out of fashion a long time ago........if it isn't too much of a problem, just open up the drive bay & check on the disk itself."
Errr ... I did look at the disk as you suggested, and read the label. You were right. Could you please help me spell 'idiot' ... I retire embarrassed.
Thanks for your help, and apologies for wasting your time.
Errr ... I did look at the disk as you suggested, and read the label. You were right. Could you please help me spell 'idiot' ... I retire embarrassed.
Thanks for your help, and apologies for wasting your time.
- Posts: 2,238 dolphin_oracle
- Joined: 16 Dec 2007
#5
welcome to the forum, PDW42! Your little escapade with your disk size marks you as one of us! __{{emoticon}}__
- Posts: 3 PDW42
- Joined: 05 Mar 2017
#6
Hhhmmm ... thanks (I think), dolphin_oracle __{{emoticon}}__
- Posts: 521 Shay
- Joined: 20 Apr 2015
#7
Welcome to the club, but I think I beat you to that trick by about 15 or more years.PDW42 wrote:fatmac:"You sure you didn't upgrade your disk - 10GB (or even 20GB) disks went out of fashion a long time ago........if it isn't too much of a problem, just open up the drive bay & check on the disk itself."
Errr ... I did look at the disk as you suggested, and read the label. You were right. Could you please help me spell 'idiot' ... I retire embarrassed.
Thanks for your help, and apologies for wasting your time.
- Posts: 850 fatmac
- Joined: 26 Jul 2012
#8
__{{emoticon}}__ We all do it at sometime......welcome to the club! __{{emoticon}}__