Posts: 7
pcallahan80
Joined: 30 Mar 2014
#1
Successfully installed from CD/DVD...Lookin' great!!! Congratulations to the antiX-15 devs. Running very smooth.

Had some issues with USB flash drive install, though...Using dd method...tried on several different flash drives resulting in consisten error. The installation menu comes up fine...then:

Code: Select all

Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown -block(0,0)
Anyone else seeing that?
Posts: 850
fatmac
Joined: 26 Jul 2012
#2
I think that was what I saw when I gave it a quick go the other day, just thought I may have had a bad download, but I now think it may not be a hybrid .iso. Try running isohybrid on your .iso & try again.
Posts: 7
pcallahan80
Joined: 30 Mar 2014
#3
Thanks, fatmac. Could be as simple as that...I'll try it in a minute or two...
Posts: 1,308
BitJam
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
#4
I was unable to replicate the problem. I was able to boot a dd LiveUSB made with the command:

Code: Select all

sudo dd if=antiX-15-V_386-full.iso of=/dev/sdd bs=4M
If you tell me the .iso file you were using I will see if I that works here as a dd LiveUSB.
Posts: 7
pcallahan80
Joined: 30 Mar 2014
#5
Using antiX-15-V_x64-full.iso, BJ.
Posts: 7
pcallahan80
Joined: 30 Mar 2014
#6
Ran isohybrid on the file...dd method to flash drive...problem solved. So looks like antiX-15-V_x64-full.iso is not a hybrid .iso...
Posts: 1,308
BitJam
Joined: 31 Aug 2009
#7
antiX-15-V_x64-full.iso worked fine here too. Here is the md5 sum:

Code: Select all

1ede769449d98d42b8e909a77218901b  antiX-15-V_x64-full.iso
Posts: 88
kmathern
Joined: 25 Aug 2012
#8
pcallahan80 wrote:Ran isohybrid on the file...dd method to flash drive...problem solved. So looks like antiX-15-V_x64-full.iso is not a hybrid .iso...
I'm pretty sure it's already a isohybrid iso.
I just created a 'dd' LiveUSB with antiX-15-V_x64-full (and without needing run isohybrid on it) and it boots/runs okay.
I'm running it right now in a live-session to make this post.
Posts: 7
pcallahan80
Joined: 30 Mar 2014
#9
kmathern wrote:
pcallahan80 wrote:Ran isohybrid on the file...dd method to flash drive...problem solved. So looks like antiX-15-V_x64-full.iso is not a hybrid .iso...
I'm pretty sure it's already a isohybrid iso.
I just created a 'dd' LiveUSB with antiX-15-V_x64-full (and without needing run isohybrid on it) and it boots/runs okay.
I'm running it right now in a live-session to make this post.
Hmmm...then why would the Kernel panic go away after applying the 'isohybrid' command to the .iso?

@BitJam...my md5sum matches yours.
anticapitalista
Posts: 5,956
Site Admin
Joined: 11 Sep 2007
#10
pcallahan80 - where did you download the file from?
Posts: 88
kmathern
Joined: 25 Aug 2012
#11
pcallahan80 wrote:@BitJam...my md5sum matches yours.
It still matches after running isohybrid on it?

I don't think it should match if it was 'isohybridized' twice.

Doesn't the filesize get a little larger if you run isohybrid on it a 2nd time? (the 1st time being when Anti or BitJam created the iso)



edit:
I guess not. I just ran isohybrid on my copy of the antiX-15-V_x64-full.iso file and the filesize and md5sum didn't change,
Posts: 7
pcallahan80
Joined: 30 Mar 2014
#12
anticapitalista wrote:pcallahan80 - where did you download the file from?
Hi anti, I downloaded using this link
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://sourceforge.net/projects/antix-linux/files/Final/MX-krete/"
linktext was:"https://sourceforge.net/projects/antix- ... /MX-krete/"
====================================
Posts: 850
fatmac
Joined: 26 Jul 2012
#13
(I also used the link in your release statement)