topic title: antiX-13.2 bugfix and enhancements release
Posts: 347
Silent Observer
Joined: 08 Aug 2013
#46
anticapitalista wrote:S.O - But, you were going from antiX-full Wheezy to antiX-full testing so you should expect loads of downloads.
If you had stayed with Wheezy (default) then the downloads would have been in their tens.
Well, yes, but still -- when I did the same install/update on my desktop antiX machine, it took well under an hour, because 1.6 GHz Athlon XP 2000+ is just that much faster than 300 MHz Pentium II (which otherwise runs very well indeed in 13.2 Full).
worktowork
Posts 0
worktowork
#47
Please tell me why
inxi -Fxz
System: Host: antiX1 Kernel: 3.7.10-antix.7-486-smp i686 (32 bit, gcc: 4.7.2)
Desktop: Fluxbox 1.3.2 Distro: antiX-13.1_386-full Luddite 19 June 2013
Machine: Mobo: N/A model: SiS-661 Bios: Phoenix version: 6.00 PG date: 02/26/2005
CPU: Single core Intel Celeron CPU (-UP-) cache: 256 KB flags: (pae sse sse2 sse3) bmips: 5879.94 clocked at 2939.970 MHz
Graphics: Card: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] 661/741/760 PCI/AGP or 662/761Gx PCIE VGA Display Adapter bus-ID: 01:00.0
X.Org: 1.12.4 drivers: sis (unloaded: fbdev,vesa) Resolution: 1024x768@85.0hz
GLX Renderer: Gallium 0.4 on llvmpipe (LLVM 0x209) GLX Version: 2.1 Mesa 8.0.5 Direct Rendering: Yes
Audio: Card: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS7012 AC'97 Sound Controller
driver: snd_intel8x0 ports: e000 e400 bus-ID: 00:02.7
Sound: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture ver: k3.7.10-antix.7-486-smp
Network: Card: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] SiS900 PCI Fast Ethernet driver: sis900 port: e800 bus-ID: 00:04.0
IF: eth0 state: unknown speed: 100 Mbps duplex: full mac: <filter>
Drives: HDD Total Size: 80.0GB (-) 1: id: /dev/sda model: WDC_WD800BB size: 80.0GB
Partition: ID: / size: 16G used: 8.0G (53%) fs: ext4 ID: swap-1 size: 0.51GB used: 0.03GB (7%) fs: swap
Sensors: System Temperatures: cpu: 51.0C mobo: N/A
Fan Speeds (in rpm): cpu: N/A
Info: Processes: 79 Uptime: 47 min Memory: 245.0/468.6MB Runlevel: 5
Gcc sys: 4.7.2 Client: Shell (bash 4.2.37) inxi: 1.9.18
why writing antiX-13.1_386-full Luddite 19 June 2013 I have upgrade kernel and programs?
Posts: 4,164
rokytnji
Joined: 20 Feb 2009
#48
Please tell me why
Distro: antiX-13.1_386-full Luddite 19 June 2013
Time has passed since June and this February. I have a AntiX 11 box that is current but I keep on top of apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade
on that install. I have a ran Mate, RazorQT, LX panels, you name it on that AntiX 11 base install.

I would not recommend installing now as a dist-upgrade may take years to get it current. The newer a release. The less
I have upgrade kernel and programs?
Although a kernel upgrade is really never that necessary.
Neither are programs if you do not wish to.
After all.
You decide.
anticapitalista
Posts: 5,955
Site Admin
Joined: 11 Sep 2007
#49
worktowork wrote:Please tell me why

why writing antiX-13.1_386-full Luddite 19 June 2013 I have upgrade kernel and programs?
Because that date refers to when it was released.