topic title: Antinatalism/VHEMT/Efilism/however else you wanna say it
Posts: 521
Shay
Joined: 20 Apr 2015
#16

========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antinatalism"
linktext was:"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antinatalism"
====================================


I know some ladies he had best stay away from.
Posts: 28
Skyroz
Joined: 06 Apr 2017
#17
fatmac wrote:Well, from what I got from your post, antinatalism is against birth, therefore you are looking to wipe out humanity.

Over here, the younger generations get to pay for their elders, we all have, so when you get old there won't be anyone left - does that really make sense to you!

The planet will just end up devoid of life.
I love how easily you brush off all those factors of life that cause pain in favor of pollyanna pipe dreams. Because the next generation has to"Help their elders." How does it not"make sense" to stop perpetuating pain and agony for your so-called loved ones? Furthermore there is nothing bad about nonexistence as my original topic post explains. Happiness doesn't need to exist because it serves no purpose and MUST coincide with even greater amounts of pain. Nothing suffers from not being born. Quality of life has only gotten worse with overpopulation and I think to argue that is absurd (personally here in California wide open space is quickly disappearing due to breeder psychos).

Keep making the same old arguments for"tradition" and"the beauty of nature." No really, it just gives me more YT video ideas.

edit: for a simplified video that basically covers my stance on the naturalism fallacy
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2trvKezyhjE"
linktext was:"click here"
====================================
(vid not by me)
Last edited by Skyroz on 29 Apr 2017, 16:09, edited 2 times in total.
Posts: 28
Skyroz
Joined: 06 Apr 2017
#18
Shay wrote:
========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antinatalism"
linktext was:"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antinatalism"
====================================


I know some ladies he had best stay away from.
I like the petite sweeties... No whoring out women like livestock for me thanks __{{emoticon}}__
Posts: 4,164
rokytnji
Joined: 20 Feb 2009
#19
__{{emoticon}}__ OMG. He is puritan also. I posted no out right boob shots. Just 2 free spirits enjoying themselves and smiling about life in general. Having a good time living. It takes a twisted mind to assign something more to that.

You scored zero points with me also with
Like I said before, that's just flat on it's face retarded.
I recognize a negative bummer personality when I hear it. Bye for good. Since my the links in my posts offend you. Enjoy the forum.
Posts: 28
Skyroz
Joined: 06 Apr 2017
#20
rokytnji wrote: __{{emoticon}}__ OMG. He is puritan also. I posted no out right boob shots. Just 2 free spirits enjoying themselves and smiling about life in general. Having a good time living. It takes a twisted mind to assign something more to that.

You scored zero points with me also with
Like I said before, that's just flat on it's face retarded.
I recognize a negative bummer personality when I hear it. Bye for good. Since my the links in my posts offend you. Enjoy the forum.
Negative bummer personality? You're just plainly and simply looking at life from a fantastical point of view, as if we're at Disneyworld and all the bombings in the middle east are just fireworks... enjoy the show! Like I said I won't be going anywhere (other than perhaps banned from this forum for not fitting in to the social hierarchy properly).

And puritan... naw __{{emoticon}}__ I can be a pretty sick fuck but I just don't abuse women by using them like an object to perpetuate endless DNA trophy nihilism. I associate boobs with women being treated as second class citizens; according to society they are only supposed to drain milk from their ever-inflating breasts and do everything their patriarch tells them to do. So because of that the sight of big boobs makes me feel ill. Pregnancy has extremely negative short term and long term health effects on women but of course I've only ever heard a woman say that so what do they know right? sarcasm

edit: I just noticed all of my posts are censored now... funny that. Can't even speak my mind on a public forum without getting beat over the head by the thought police.
Posts: 4,164
rokytnji
Joined: 20 Feb 2009
#21
Skyroz wrote:
rokytnji wrote: __{{emoticon}}__ OMG. He is puritan also. I posted no out right boob shots. Just 2 free spirits enjoying themselves and smiling about life in general. Having a good time living. It takes a twisted mind to assign something more to that.

You scored zero points with me also with
Like I said before, that's just flat on it's face retarded.
I recognize a negative bummer personality when I hear it. Bye for good. Since my the links in my posts offend you. Enjoy the forum.
Negative bummer personality? You're just plainly and simply looking at life from a fantastical point of view, as if we're at Disneyworld and all the bombings in the middle east are just fireworks... enjoy the show! Like I said I won't be going anywhere (other than perhaps banned from this forum for not fitting in to the social hierarchy properly).

And puritan... naw __{{emoticon}}__ I can be a pretty sick fuck but I just don't abuse women by using them like an object to perpetuate endless DNA trophy nihilism. I associate boobs with women being treated as second class citizens; according to society they are only supposed to drain milk from their ever-inflating breasts and do everything their patriarch tells them to do. So because of that the sight of big boobs makes me feel ill. Pregnancy has extremely negative short term and long term health effects on women but of course I've only ever heard a woman say that so what do they know right? sarcasm

edit: I just noticed all of my posts are censored now... funny that. Can't even speak my mind on a public forum without getting beat over the head by the thought police.
Not by me. As you can see.; I can read your posts..
Posts: 28
Skyroz
Joined: 06 Apr 2017
#22
rokytnji wrote:
Not by me. As you can see.; I can read your posts..
Look at all the comments with more than one asterisk in them. I didn't do that. They were edited after the fact by someone else (edit: nope, see below). Needlessly I might add. I can't speak without cursing here and there. I don't need it all the time like a potty mouth but I just want my due respect to not be censored.
Last edited by Skyroz on 30 Apr 2017, 00:56, edited 2 times in total.
Posts: 1,445
skidoo
Joined: 09 Feb 2012
#23
10 Jan, 2017

========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://support.freeforums.org/viewtopic.php?t=136533"
linktext was:"http://support.freeforums.org/viewtopic.php?t=136533"
====================================


As you may have noticed, we have started to filter certain questionable words from appearing in posts. We are also begin to filtering adult images. The words and content are still posted, but they are filtered from view. There are a couple of reasons why the filters are in place.

1) The Terms of Service do not allow for for obscene and vulgar language or content. To help insure no one is offended by the language, we are inserting"***" so the meaning is conveyed with the use of the actual words. If a post contains too many vulgar or hateful words/images, it will likely trigger the entire post to be removed.

2) The other reason for implementing the filters, being perfectly honest, is financial. Advertisers do not allow their ads to appear next to content that is deemed obscene or vulgar. And to help insure the content is eligible for advertising, we are filtering the words and images.

Alternatives to see unfiltered content:

If the board elects to pay for an ad free site, then content will not be filtered
In the next couple of weeks, we will add an option to allow boards that elect to have ad-free, also elect to only see filtered content.

Thank you for understanding the need to provide a safe environment for members and for advertisers.
admins and moderators will see the unfiltered versions
forums paying for ad-removal can opt out

( cost is $10.00 per 34,482 pageviews[/color )
it's not language dependent

( complaints of"perfectly normal" Dutch words being asteriskerated )
10 Mar 2017

========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://lightafterlife.freeforums.org/viewtopic.php?t=1451&p=7326"
linktext was:"http://lightafterlife.freeforums.org/vi ... 451&p=7326"
====================================

no pre-warning was given to forum admins about this extra cenorship, all forums already have a word censorship option in place - but this new crazy idea (which is apparently being implemented by the advertising sponsors) overrides any existing format - and is simply causing havoc on all FreeForums sites.
Posts: 28
Skyroz
Joined: 06 Apr 2017
#24
10 Mar 2017

========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"http://lightafterlife.freeforums.org/viewtopic.php?t=1451&p=7326"
linktext was:"http://lightafterlife.freeforums.org/vi ... 451&p=7326"
====================================

no pre-warning was given to forum admins about this extra cenorship, all forums already have a word censorship option in place - but this new crazy idea (which is apparently being implemented by the advertising sponsors) overrides any existing format - and is simply causing havoc on all FreeForums sites.
Ah, I get it now. Carry along! Didn't mean to point fingers __{{emoticon}}__
ChuangTzu
Posts: 13
ChuangTzu
Joined: 01 May 2016
#25
wow, how did i miss this thread, (been off the forum for a while thats how).

First...this philosophy sounds more like a justification to rant off about a sordid personal existence, according to this philosophy would suicide be an ideal? As anti said utter drivel. Regarding your claim that mankind has done nothing in its existence I suggest you look at Professor Joseph Needhams research into the vast history of China, most of what you are using today Including that computer is thanks to the ancient Chinese. They did far more then paper and compass etc...

On the contrary humans are the highest being on this planet at least, and for now at least, the Bonobo ape does have some intensely aware eyes though.

========= SCRAPER REMOVED AN EMBEDDED LINK HERE ===========
url was:"https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=bonobo+apes+human+like"
linktext was:"https://www.youtube.com/results?search_ ... human+like"
====================================
Posts: 307
eugen-b
Joined: 23 Aug 2015
#26
I think it is ok as long as you consider your own life worthless and not extrapolate to the lives of others.