Running Antix 17 B3 customized install from net-install iso in VirtualBox on a Wheezy host I assume like Debian when it's Testing status, if I use"dist-upgrade" instead of"upgrade" the installation will progress from betas to RCs to Final Release (Stable). This is what I did with my Wheezy install while it was still Testing. This procedure was in the install docs.
Thanks
Patrick
topic title: 17b3 to 17 RC1? Dist-upgrade?
4 posts
• Page 1 of 1
-
Posts: 7
- Joined: 19 Sep 2017
-
anticapitalista
Posts: 5,955
- Site Admin
- Joined: 11 Sep 2007
#2
You are already using Stable (Stretch) unless you changed the repos to Testing. If you have done this, then you are no longer running Stable.
Or, if you mean, can I upgrade antiX-b3 to rc and final via apt-get dist-upgrade, then yes you can.
However, the etc/antix-version file will not get updated to show this. (We prefer to know where the iso started rather than where you are at after a dist-upgrade).
You will also not get any changes made to the live side. (Actually if you make a snapshot and create a new iso, then this new iso *will* have all the latest on the 'live' side).
Or, if you mean, can I upgrade antiX-b3 to rc and final via apt-get dist-upgrade, then yes you can.
However, the etc/antix-version file will not get updated to show this. (We prefer to know where the iso started rather than where you are at after a dist-upgrade).
You will also not get any changes made to the live side. (Actually if you make a snapshot and create a new iso, then this new iso *will* have all the latest on the 'live' side).
-
Posts: 7
- Joined: 19 Sep 2017
#3
Sorry for the confusion about the"Testing/Stable" comparison. I know 17 is based off the stable version of Stretch.. Your second option was what I was asking about. Also, thanks for the clarification regarding antix-version. I was wondering if there was any file that listed which Antix version (beta, rc, etc.) was in actual use. Now I know there's not.
The"Live" version is of no concern to me. I didn't use it for the install. But it's good to know just in case.
I have other questions that need clarification or fixes, but will leave those for another day.
Thanks.
Patrick
The"Live" version is of no concern to me. I didn't use it for the install. But it's good to know just in case.
I have other questions that need clarification or fixes, but will leave those for another day.
Thanks.
Patrick
-
Posts: 1,445
- Joined: 09 Feb 2012
#4
but, as anticapitalista mentioned, its content remains unchanged if dist-upgrade is performed on the system.
lsb-release"only tells half the story" anyhow ~~ it does not convey which (stable vs testing, plus additional) repositories have been selected.
/etc/lsb-releasefile that listed which Antix version
but, as anticapitalista mentioned, its content remains unchanged if dist-upgrade is performed on the system.
lsb-release"only tells half the story" anyhow ~~ it does not convey which (stable vs testing, plus additional) repositories have been selected.